...
首页> 外文期刊>Seminars in dialysis >Clinical and Economic Value of Performing Dialysis Vascular Access Procedures in a Freestanding Office-Based Center as Compared with the Hospital Outpatient Department among Medicare ESRD Beneficiaries
【24h】

Clinical and Economic Value of Performing Dialysis Vascular Access Procedures in a Freestanding Office-Based Center as Compared with the Hospital Outpatient Department among Medicare ESRD Beneficiaries

机译:与Medicare ESRD受益人的医院门诊部相比,在独立式办公室中心进行透析血管通路手术的临床和经济价值

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Dialysis vascular access (DVA) care is being increasingly provided in freestanding office-based centers (FOC). Small-scale studies have suggested that DVA care in a FOC results in favorable patient outcomes and lower costs. To further evaluate this issue, data were drawn from incident and prevalent ESRD patients within a 4-year sample (2006-2009) of Medicare claims (USRDS) on cases who receive at least 80% of their DVA care in a FOC or a hospital outpatient department (HOPD). Using propensity score matching techniques, cases with a similar clinical and demographic profile from these two sites of service were matched. Medicare utilization, payments, and patient outcomes were compared across the matched cohorts (n = 27,613). Patients treated in the FOC had significantly better outcomes (p < 0.001), including fewer related or unrelated hospitalizations (3.8 vs. 4.4), vascular access-related infections (0.18 vs. 0.29), and septicemia-related hospitalizations (0.15 vs. 0.18). Mortality rate was lower (47.9% vs. 53.5%) as were PMPM payments ($4,982 vs. $5,566). This study shows that DVA management provided in a FOC has multiple advantages over that provided in a HOPD.
机译:独立式办公室中心(FOC)越来越多地提供透析血管通路(DVA)护理。小型研究表明,在FOC中进行DVA护理可产生有利的患者预后并降低成本。为了进一步评估该问题,在4年(2006-2009年)医疗保险索赔(USRDS)样本中,从在FOC或医院接受至少80%DVA护理的病例中,从事件和普通ESRD患者中收集数据门诊部(HOPD)。使用倾向得分匹配技术,对来自这两个服务地点的具有相似临床和人口统计学特征的病例进行匹配。在匹配的队列中比较了医疗保险的使用,付款和患者结局(n = 27,613)。在FOC中接受治疗的患者的结局明显更好(p <0.001),包括相关或不相关的住院治疗(3.8 vs. 4.4),与血管通路相关的感染(0.18 vs. 0.29)和败血症相关的住院治疗(0.15 vs. 0.18)更少。 )。死亡率较低(47.9%比53.5%),而PMPM支付的死亡率也较低(分别为4,982美元和5,566美元)。这项研究表明,FOC中提供的DVA管理比HOPD中提供的DVA管理具有多个优势。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号