首页> 外文期刊>SAE International Journal of Fuels and Lubricants >Comparison of Fuel Economy and Exhaust Emission Tests of 4WD Vehicles using Single-Axis Chassis Dynamometer and Dual-Axis Chassis Dynamometer
【24h】

Comparison of Fuel Economy and Exhaust Emission Tests of 4WD Vehicles using Single-Axis Chassis Dynamometer and Dual-Axis Chassis Dynamometer

机译:单轴底盘测功机和双轴底盘测功机对四轮驱动车辆燃油经济性和尾气排放测试的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The demands of application of dual-axis chassis dynamometers (4WD-CHDY) have increased recently due to the improvement of performance of 4WD-CHDY and an increase in the number of 4WD vehicles which are difficult to convert to 2WD. However, there are few evaluations of any differences between fuel economy and exhaust emission levels in the case of 2WD-CHDY with conversion from 4WD to 2WD (2WD-mode) and 4WD-CHDY without conversion to 2WD (4WD-mode). Fuel economy and exhaust emission tests of 4WD vehicle equipped with a typical 4WD mechanism were performed to investigate any differences between the case of the 2WD-mode and the 4WD-mode. In these tests, we measured 'work at wheel' (wheel-work) using wheel torque meters. A comparison of the 2WD-mode and the 4WD-mode reveals a difference of fuel economy (2WD-mode is 1.5% better than that of 4WD-mode) and wheel-work (2WD-mode is 3.9% less than that of 4WD-mode). However, there are almost no differences of exhaust emission levels. We found the difference of work of loss at tire (tire-loss-work) between the 2WD-mode and the 4WD-mode affects the difference of fuel economy. Moreover, we found the difference of driving force of each tire affects the difference of the total amount of tire-loss-work between the 2WD-mode and the 4WD-mode. Such evaluation of these differences is new area of research and there are very few studies using wheel torque meters. Therefore, these results provide very valuable information to assess the future necessity of application of 4WD-CHDY.
机译:由于四轮驱动车的性能提高以及难以转换为两轮驱动的四轮驱动车辆的数量增加,近来对双轴底盘测功机(4WD-CHDY)的应用需求增加了。但是,对于从4WD转换为2WD(2WD模式)的2WD-CHDY和不转换为2WD(4WD模式)的4WD-CHDY的情况,很少有燃油经济性和排气排放水平之间的差异的评估。对配备有典型4WD机构的4WD车辆进行了燃油经济性和尾气排放测试,以研究2WD模式和4WD模式之间的区别。在这些测试中,我们使用车轮扭矩计测量了“车轮工作”(车轮工作)。 2WD模式和4WD模式的比较显示出燃油经济性(2WD模式比4WD模式好1.5%)和轮毂(2WD模式比4WD模式少3.9%)之间的差异。模式)。但是,废气排放水平几乎没有差异。我们发现2WD模式和4WD模式之间的轮胎损耗功(轮胎损耗功)的差异会影响燃油经济性的差异。而且,我们发现每个轮胎的驱动力的差异会影响2WD模式和4WD模式之间轮胎总损耗的差异。对这些差异的这种评估是新的研究领域,很少有使用车轮扭矩计的研究。因此,这些结果为评估未来应用4WD-CHDY的必要性提供了非常有价值的信息。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号