...
首页> 外文期刊>Scandinavian journal of clinical and laboratory investigation. >Non-invasive measurements of cardiac output in atrial fibrillation: inert gas rebreathing and impedance cardiography.
【24h】

Non-invasive measurements of cardiac output in atrial fibrillation: inert gas rebreathing and impedance cardiography.

机译:心房颤动心输出量的非侵入性测量:惰性气体呼吸和阻抗心动图。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. To test the effect of interventions, knowledge of cardiac output (CO) is important. However, the irregular heart rate might cause some methods for determination of CO to have inherent weaknesses. Objective. To assess the validity of these methods in AF, a new inert gas rebreathing device and impedance cardiography was tested with echocardiography as reference. METHODS: Using a cross-sectional design, 127 patients with AF and 24 in SR were consecutively recruited. Resting CO was measured using inert gas rebreathing (n = 62) or impedance measurement of intrathoracic blood flow (n = 89) in separate studies with echocardiographic measurement as reference. RESULTS: CO determined with impedance cardiography was mean 4.77 L/min +/- 2.24(SD) compared to 4.93 L/min +/- 1.17 by echocardiography (n = 89, n.s.) in patients with AF. CO by inert gas rebreathing was 4.98 L/min +/- 2.49(SD) compared to 5.70 L/min +/- 2.49 by echocardiography (n = 62, n.s.) in patients with AF and SR (AF 5.42 +/- 2.9 vs. 6.27, n.s. and SR 4.09 +/- 1.08 vs. 4.35 +/- 0.86, n.s.). Mean bias between impedance cardiography and echocardiography was 0.14 +/- 0.95 L/min and -0.13 +/- 0.98 L/min between inert gas rebreathing and echocardiography. Inert gas rebreathing showed larger intra-patient variation than impedance cardiography (0.11 vs. 0.054). Correlation between inert gas rebreathing and echocardiography was r = -0.060 and between impedance cardiography and echocardiography was r = 0.128. Impedance cardiography and inert gas rebreathing both underestimated CO compared to echocardiography. CONCLUSION: Variation between the inert gas rebreathing and the reference method for AF patients was less than desired. Impedance cardiography was superior to inert gas rebreathing and showed acceptable agreement with echocardiography and variability similar to echocardiography.
机译:背景:房颤(AF)与明显的发病率和死亡率有关。为了测试干预措施的效果,了解心输出量(CO)很重要。但是,心律不规则可能会导致某些确定CO的方法具有固有的弱点。目的。为了评估这些方法在房颤中的有效性,以超声心动图为参考,测试了一种新型的惰性气体呼吸装置和阻抗心动图。方法:采用横断面设计,连续招募127例AF患者和24例SR患者。使用超声心动图测量作为参考,在单独的研究中使用惰性气体呼吸(n = 62)或胸腔内血流阻抗测量(n = 89)测量静止的CO。结果:经心电图测定的心律失常的平均CO为4.77 L / min +/- 2.24(SD),而AF患者超声心动图检查的N为4.93 L / min +/- 1.17(n = 89,n.s.)。在患有AF和SR的患者中,通过惰性气体呼吸产生的CO为4.98 L / min +/- 2.49(SD),而超声心动图(n = 62,ns)为5.70 L / min +/- 2.49(AF 5.42 +/- 2.9 vs 6.27,ns和SR 4.09 +/- 1.08与4.35 +/- 0.86,ns)。阻抗心动图和超声心动图之间的平均偏差为0.14 +/- 0.95 L / min,惰性气体呼吸和超声心动图之间的平均偏差为-0.13 +/- 0.98 L / min。惰性气体呼吸比阻抗心动图显示出更大的患者内部差异(0.11比0.054)。惰性气体呼吸与超声心动图之间的相关性为r = -0.060,而阻抗心动图与超声心动图之间的相关性为r = 0.128。与超声心动图相比,阻抗心动图和惰性气体呼吸均低估了CO。结论:AF患者的惰性气体呼吸和参考方法之间的差异小于期望值。阻抗心动图优于惰性气体呼吸,并且与超声心动图显示出可接受的一致性,并且与超声心动图相似,变异性也好。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号