首页> 外文期刊>Science in context >Disturbing Dogmas: Biologists and the History of Biology
【24h】

Disturbing Dogmas: Biologists and the History of Biology

机译:干扰教条:生物学家与生物学史

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The attitude of biologists to the history of their discipline varies. For some, a hazy knowledge of the recent past is all that is necessary to provide an explanatory basis for their work. They take it for granted that everything of value from the less recent past has been appropriately incorporated into present-day thinking. Other biologists see history as an integral part of their research: the historical roots of accepted facts and theories help in the evaluation of present positions. These biologists bring to history their specialized knowledge, which can be an advantage, but often they also bring an agenda that biases what they investigate and how they present it. We illustrate this by describing our own foray into history, which was motivated by findings in cell biology that suggested that some accepted views about heredity and evolution were wrong.
机译:生物学家对其学科历史的态度各不相同。对于某些人来说,对最近的过去的朦胧知识是为他们的工作提供解释性基础所必需的。他们认为,近来的所有有价值的东西都已适当地纳入当今的思维之中。其他生物学家将历史视为他们研究的组成部分:公认事实和理论的历史渊源有助于评估当前的立场。这些生物学家将他们的专业知识带入了历史,这可能是一个优势,但通常他们还会提出一个偏颇的议程,这些议程会偏重他们所研究的内容以及展示方式。我们通过描述自己对历史的尝试来说明这一点,这是由细胞生物学的发现所推动的,这些发现表明某些关于遗传和进化的公认观点是错误的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号