...
首页> 外文期刊>Cardiovascular engineering and technology >Pressure Sensitivity of Axial-Flow and Centrifugal-Flow Left Ventricular Assist Devices
【24h】

Pressure Sensitivity of Axial-Flow and Centrifugal-Flow Left Ventricular Assist Devices

机译:轴流和离心流左心室辅助装置的压力敏感性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Continuous-flow ventricular assist devices (CF-VADs) defy normal physiologic principles associated with pulsatile flow. Despite being programmed at set speeds, pump flow can be modified by variations in the pressure differential across the pump, termed pressure sensitivity (PS). Currently, PS has been reported using steady-state closed-loop systems that are unable to provide physiologically-relevant assessment of PS or account for partially- or fully-unloaded ventricles. We report a unique model system to examine PS and its influence on efficiency of CF-VADs. A mock-circulation loop was designed that measures low and high extremes of pressure differential. Two axial-flow and two centrifugal-flow VADs were tested. Device output flow rate, preload, and afterload were measured and PS was calculated. Numerical models were implemented to simulate "fully-loaded," "partially-unloaded," and "fully-unloaded" cardiac cycles. Our open-loop model successfully generated pressure gradients that were lower than typical when using static, closed-loop systems. All devices exhibit highest PS during early diastole; however, average PS values of centrifugal-flow were 3× greater than axial-flow devices. The average maximum PS for the axial and centrifugal VADs under physiologic conditions was 0.08 and 0.42 L/min/mmHg, respectively. Compared to the axial-flow pumps, the two centrifugal-flow VADs in our study demonstrate increased PS at intermediate to low flow rates. Enhanced device PS allows for more effective self-regulation of device output, thus allowing a given VAD to better mimic the native heart under exercise conditions, and minimize undesirable effects, including ventricular suck-down or atrial collapse.
机译:连续流心室辅助设备(CF-VAD)违反了与脉动流相关的正常生理原理。尽管以设定的速度进行了编程,但可以通过称为压敏度(PS)的整个泵压差的变化来修改泵的流量。当前,已经报道了使用稳态闭环系统的PS,该系统不能提供PS的生理相关评估,也不能解释部分或完全卸载的心室。我们报告了一个独特的模型系统来检查PS及其对CF-VADs效率的影响。设计了模拟循环回路,可测量压差的极低值和极值。测试了两个轴流和两个离心流VAD。测量设备的输出流速,预加载和后加载,并计算PS。实施数值模型以模拟“完全加载”,“部分卸载”和“完全卸载”的心动周期。我们的开环模型成功生成了比使用静态闭环系统时低的压力梯度。在舒张早期,所有装置的PS最高;但是,离心流的平均PS值是轴向流装置的3倍。在生理条件下,轴向和离心VAD的平均最大PS分别为0.08和0.42 L / min / mmHg。与轴流泵相比,我们研究中的两个离心流VAD证明了在中低流量时PS增大。增强型设备PS可以更有效地自我调节设备输出,从而使给定的VAD在运动条件下更好地模仿原始心脏,并最大程度地减少不良影响,包括心室吸吮或心房塌陷。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号