...
首页> 外文期刊>Cerebral cortex >Corticomuscular Coherence Reflects Interindividual Differences in the State of the Corticomuscular Network During Low-Level Static and Dynamic Forces
【24h】

Corticomuscular Coherence Reflects Interindividual Differences in the State of the Corticomuscular Network During Low-Level Static and Dynamic Forces

机译:在低水平的静态和动态力作用下,皮质视神经相干性反映了皮质视神经网络状态的个体差异

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

In the investigation of corticomuscular coherence (CMC), it remained unclear why some subjects do not present significant CMC. We predicted that such subjects will develop CMC as a result of learning as indexed by improved performance during a visuomgtor task. We investigated CMC, cortical motor spectral power (SP), and performance in 14 subjects during isometric compensation of a static force or dynamic force (DF) with their right index finger. We compared data from the beginning of the experiment (Time-Period 1) and after learning (Time-Period 2). Eight subjects (Group CMC++) presented CMC during Period 1 which increased during Period 2. Six subjects (Group CMC-h) presented CMC only during Period 2. Group CMC-+ was "more desynchronized" (lower SP, and stronger task-related desynchronization) than Group CMC++, The performance was better in Group CMC++ than in Group CMC-+. Learning was associated with higher SP, higher CMC, and better performance in both groups. However, in the more complicated DF condition. Group CMC++ learned better than Group CMC-+. The present study demonstrates the presence of CMC in all subjects tested and evidence that this is due to the fact that individuals may fall into 2 different groups in terms of oscillatory motor control: Group CMC-+ presents CMC only after learning.
机译:在对皮层细胞相干性(CMC)的研究中,尚不清楚为什么某些受试者没有表现出明显的CMC。我们预言,由于在学习者任务期间表现的提高,这些受试者将因学习而发展为CMC。我们用他们的右手食指对静态力或动态力(DF)进行等距补偿时,调查了14位受试者的CMC,皮质运动频谱功率(SP)和性能。我们比较了实验开始时(时间段1)和学习后(时间段2)的数据。八个受试者(CMC ++组)在第1阶段呈现CMC,而在第2阶段有所增加。六个受试者(CMC-h组)仅在第2阶段呈现CMC。CMC-+组“更不同步”(SP较低,与任务相关性更强与组CMC ++相比,性能更好)。在组CMC ++中,性能比在组CMC- +中更好。在两组中,学习与更高的SP,更高的CMC和更好的表现相关。但是,在更复杂的DF条件下。 CMC ++组比CMC- +学得更好。本研究表明,在所有测试的受试者中均存在CMC,并证明这是由于个体在振荡运动控制方面可能分为两个不同的组:CMC- +组仅在学习后才提供CMC。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号