...
首页> 外文期刊>Otology and neurotology: official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology >Medicolegal Concerns Among Neurotologists in Ordering MRIs for Idiopathic Sensorineural Hearing Loss and Asymmetric Sensorineural Hearing Loss
【24h】

Medicolegal Concerns Among Neurotologists in Ordering MRIs for Idiopathic Sensorineural Hearing Loss and Asymmetric Sensorineural Hearing Loss

机译:在神经病学家中,订购特发性感觉神经性听力损失和非对称性感觉神经性听力损失的MRI的法医学问题

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objective: To determine if neurotologists order magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in cases of idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss (sudden deafness) and of asymmetric sensorineural hearing loss (ASNHL) for medicolegal reasons. Study Design: Survey of 480 American neurotologists. Main Outcome Measures: 1) The frequency with which neurotologists/otologists in the United States order MRI in sudden deafeess and ASNHL, 2) the frequency of medicolegal issues as motivations for ordering MRIs, 3) the frequency of abnormal MRIs, and 4) the prevalence of auditory brainstem reflex (ABR) and acoustic reflex testing as screening tools before ordering an MRI.Results: Approximately 146 responses (30.4%) were received. Ninety-five percent and 94% ordered MRIs in their patients with ASNHL and sudden deafness respectively. Forty percent of the respondents said medicolegal concerns factored into their decision to order a scan. Seventy-seven percent and 82% reported finding vestibular schwannomas in less than 1% to 4% of MRIs for ASNHL and sudden deafness, respectively. Approximately one-third of the respondents still use ABR and acoustic reflex testing as screening tools.Conclusion: MRIs are the gold standard for determining retro-cochlear pathology in the setting of sudden deafness and ASNHL but are expensive. Approximately one-third of the respondents still use ABR and acoustic reflex testing as screening tools before ordering MRI. MRI typically have a low yield in finding an abnormality (usually <1%-4%). Neurotologists in our survey seem to recognize this quandary: they usually order an MRI, although they know it will usually be negative, and 40% of them cite medicolegal concerns as one of the motivations for their decision. This suggests that routine use of MRI partially reflects the practice of defensive medicine rather than medicine based on evidence. Perhaps MRIs are rarely indicated as the initial screening tool in ASNHL and sudden deafness, given their high cost and...
机译:目的:确定神经科医生是否因法医学原因对特发性突然感觉神经性听力损失(突然耳聋)和非对称性感觉神经性听力损失(ASNHL)进行磁共振成像(MRI)检查。研究设计:480位美国神经病学家的调查。主要结果指标:1)美国神经病学家/耳科医生在突发性聋和ASNHL中订购MRI的频率; 2)以法医问题作为订购MRI动机的频率; 3)异常MRI的频率; 4)在订购MRI之前,使用听觉脑干反射(ABR)和声学反射测试作为筛查工具的患病率。结果:收到约146例反应(30.4%)。分别有95%和94%的ASNHL和突发性耳聋患者进行MRI检查。 40%的受访者表示,在决定订购扫描产品时会考虑到法医问题。分别有77%和82%的患者在ASNHL和突发性耳聋的MRI中发现前庭神经鞘瘤少于1%至4%。大约三分之一的受访者仍使用ABR和声反射测试作为筛查工具。结论:MRI是确定突发性耳聋和ASNHL时耳蜗后病理的金标准,但价格昂贵。在订购MRI之前,约有三分之一的受访者仍使用ABR和声反射测试作为筛查工具。 MRI通常发现异常的良率较低(通常<1%-4%)。在我们的调查中,神经病学家似乎认识到了这一难题:尽管他们通常知道MRI通常是阴性的,但他们通常会要求进行MRI检查,其中40%的人将禁忌医学作为他们做出决定的动机之一。这表明MRI的常规使用部分反映了防御性医学的实践,而不是基于证据的医学。鉴于MRI的高成本和昂贵的价值,也许很少将MRI作为ASNHL和突发性耳聋的初始筛查工具。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号