首页> 外文期刊>Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery: official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery >Comparison of delivery of topical medications to the paranasal sinuses via vertex-to-floor
【24h】

Comparison of delivery of topical medications to the paranasal sinuses via vertex-to-floor

机译:比较从点到底向鼻旁窦局部用药的情况

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

INTRODUCTION: Topical nasal medications are frequently employed for persistent sinonasal symptoms after functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) in chronic rhinosinusitis patients. The optimal means for the delivery of these medications is unclear. In this study, the efficacy of the vertex to floor (VF) position compared to atomizer spray was evaluated in post-FESS patients. METHODS: Three trials were performed: two trials in which patients maintained the VF position for 1 and 5 minutes, respectively, after nasal drop administration were compared to a third trial utilizing an atomizer spray in the upright position. Two independent observers rated the distribution of fluorescein-dyed dexamethasone drops at 5 sinonasal sites: maxillary sinus (MS), ethmoid cavity (EC), frontal recess (FR), sphenoid sinus (SS), and olfactory cleft (OC). RESULTS: VF position consistently delivered nasal drops to the MS, EC, SS, and OC. The atomizer distributed drops to the MS, EC, SS, and FR. The greatest difference was noted with the nasal drops in the olfactory cleft in the VF position; statistical significance was achieved with ANOVA testing (P = 0.012). Student's paired t test comparing trial 1 to 2, 1 to 3, and 2 to 3 demonstrated greater distribution in the OC at 5 minutes compared with 1 minute and spray (P = 0.042 and 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: The VF position and atomizer spray were both effective in delivery of the dexamethasone drops to the paranasal sinuses. This has significant implications for management of patients suffering from recalcitrant chronic rhinosinusitis and/or sinonasal polyposis through the delivery of topical medications to the paranasal sinuses and olfactory cleft. EBM RATING: C.
机译:简介:对于慢性鼻-鼻窦炎患者,在功能性内窥镜鼻窦手术(FESS)后,经常使用局部鼻用药物治疗持续鼻窦症状。这些药物的最佳输送方式尚不清楚。在这项研究中,在FESS后患者中评估了与雾化器喷雾相比的顶点至地面(VF)位置的功效。方法:进行了三项试验:将两项在滴鼻剂给药后患者分别保持VF位置1分钟和5分钟的试验与第三项使用雾化器喷雾直立位置的试验进行比较。两名独立的观察者评估了荧光染色的地塞米松滴在5个鼻窦部位的分布:上颌窦(MS),筛窦(EC),额隐窝(FR),蝶窦(SS)和嗅裂(OC)。结果:VF位置始终向MS,EC,SS和OC输送滴鼻剂。雾化器将液滴分布到MS,EC,SS和FR。最大的差异是在VF位置的嗅裂中滴鼻剂。通过ANOVA测试获得统计学显着性(P = 0.012)。学生的配对t检验比较了试验1至2、1至3和2至3,结果表明5分钟时OC中的分布比1分钟和喷雾时更大(P = 0.042和0.003)。结论:VF位置和雾化器喷雾均有效地将地塞米松滴剂递送至鼻旁窦。通过将局部药物递送至鼻旁窦和嗅c裂,这对于治疗顽固性慢性鼻-鼻窦炎和/或鼻窦息肉病的患者具有重要意义。循证医学评估:C.

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号