...
首页> 外文期刊>Safety science >Speed control with and without advanced warning sign on the field: An analysis of the effect on driving speed
【24h】

Speed control with and without advanced warning sign on the field: An analysis of the effect on driving speed

机译:现场有无预警信号的速度控制:对行驶速度的影响分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Speeding is an important risk factor in road safety and police activities with regard to traffic (safety) are therefore to a large extent focused on tackling this problem. Within this study, researchers from Hasselt University worked together with 3 regional police units to test the effect of two frequently used speed interventions namely a speed control (i.e. stationary police control in an unmarked police car equipped with a mobile radar) with and without an advanced (digital) warning sign alongside the road. The effect of these 2 types of interventions is tested on two road segments of regional roads (with a maximum speed of 70 and 90 km/h), whereby interventions were switched between both roads during the second field experiment. To measure the effect of both methods, the average speed, 85th percentile of speed and odds of drivers exceeding the speed limit were analyzed, mainly by using general linear regression models. Results show for each tested intervention, significant speed reductions during the time that enforcement was in place. Generalizing these results, allows us to conclude that the effect during the speed control with advanced warning sign is larger compared to the speed control only (respectively -4.5 km/h and -2.5 km/h in the V85 speed) and also the continuing effect until one week after the intervention is higher. In the future, we recommend repeating the experiment on more locations, to enhance the reliability and generalizability of the results. To do so, further cooperation between knowledge institutions and field practitioners is advisable. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:超速驾驶是道路安全的重要风险因素,因此,在交通(安全)方面,警方的活动在很大程度上集中在解决这一问题上。在这项研究中,来自哈瑟尔特大学的研究人员与3个地区警察局合作,测试了两种常用的速度干预措施的效果,即速度控制(即在装有和不装有先进雷达的无标记警车中的固定警察控制) (数字)路边的警告标志。在区域道路的两个路段(最高速度分别为70 km / h和90 km / h)上测试了这两种干预措施的效果,从而在第二次野外实验期间在两种道路之间切换了干预措施。为了衡量这两种方法的效果,主要使用通用线性回归模型分析了平均速度,速度的第85个百分位数和驾驶员超过速度限制的几率。结果表明,对于每种经过测试的干预措施,在实施适当的时间内,速度都会大大降低。综合这些结果,我们可以得出这样的结论:与仅带有速度警告的速度控制相比,仅带有速度警告的速度影响更大(V85速度分别为-4.5 km / h和-2.5 km / h),并且还有持续影响直到干预后一个星期更高。将来,我们建议在更多位置重复该实验,以提高结果的可靠性和可推广性。为此,建议在知识机构和现场从业人员之间进行进一步合作。 (C)2016 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号