首页> 外文期刊>Safety science >Better effect of the use of a needle safety device in combination with an interactive workshop to prevent needle stick injuries
【24h】

Better effect of the use of a needle safety device in combination with an interactive workshop to prevent needle stick injuries

机译:结合使用针头安全装置和互动式工作坊以防止针刺受伤的效果更好

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objectives: This study compares the effectiveness of two types of interventions with no intervention on the prevention of needle stick injuries (NSIs). Methods: Health care workers, who were at risk for NSIs, were eligible for this three-armed cluster randomized controlled trial. In total, 23 hospital wards were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 intervention groups, which were given either a needle safety device and a workshop (NW; 7 wards, n = 267) or a workshop only (W; 8 wards, n = 263), or to a control group (C; 8 wards, n = 266). The primary outcome was the half-year incidence of NSIs, which was measured through questionnaires and official notification at the occupational health service at baseline (TO), 6 months (T1) and 12 months (T2) after baseline. Analysis were done by intention to treat. This study is registered as a prospective randomized trial, number NTR1207. Results: A statistically significant difference was found between the groups for the half-year incidence of NSIs (p = 0.046) on the basis of questionnaire data with ORs for reported NSIs for the NW group compared with the control group of 0.34 (95% CI: 0.13-0.91) and 0.45 (95% CI: 0.19-1.06) for the W group compared with the control group. The officially registered NSIs during the study period showed no statistical differences between the groups. Conclusions: The combined intervention of the introduction of needle safety devices and an interactive workshop led to the highest reduction in the number of self-reported NSIs compared to a workshop alone or no intervention.
机译:目的:本研究比较了两种干预措施与没有干预措施预防针刺伤害(NSI)的有效性。方法:具有NSI风险的医护人员有资格参加此三臂整群随机对照试验。总共将23个医院病房随机分配到2个干预组中的1个,分别给予针头安全装置和一个工作坊(西北; 7个病房,n = 267)或仅一个工作坊(W; 8个病房,n = 263) )或对照组(C; 8个病房,n = 266)。主要结局是NSI的半年发生率,这是通过在基线(TO),基线后6个月(T1)和12个月(T2)时通过职业卫生服务处的问卷调查和官方通知来衡量的。分析是按意向进行的。该研究已注册为前瞻性随机试验,编号为NTR1207。结果:根据问卷调查数据和西北地区报告的NSI的OR值,两组之间的NSI半年发生率差异有统计学意义(p = 0.046),而对照组为0.34(95%CI与对照组相比,W组:0.13-0.91)和0.45(95%CI:0.19-1.06)。在研究期间,正式注册的NSI显示两组之间无统计学差异。结论:与单独或不进行干预相比,采用针头安全装置和互动式研讨会的联合干预导致自我报告的NSI数量最多减少。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号