...
首页> 外文期刊>Safety science >A comparison of the driving behavior between remunerated and volunteer drivers
【24h】

A comparison of the driving behavior between remunerated and volunteer drivers

机译:有偿驾驶员和志愿驾驶员的驾驶行为比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Introduction: Past research suggests that some groups of work-related drivers practice more safe driving behavior than others. However, no research to date has compared the driving behavior of those remunerated for their services and volunteer work-related drivers. As such, based on a theoretical discussion of the organizational and social contexts in which work-related driving occurs, this study hypothesized that volunteers would report safer driving behavior compared with remunerated drivers. Methods: One-hundred and ninety remunerated drivers and 59 volunteers completed a self-reported driving behavior questionnaire. Results: Some support was found for the hypotheses, as volunteers reported more safe driving behavior than remunerated drivers. Specifically, volunteers reported less inattention and tiredness while driving compared to remunerated drivers. Conclusions: The results suggested that organizations need to formalize the roles and responsibilities of the work-related driver, and better integrate driving within the wider occupational health and safety system.
机译:简介:过去的研究表明,一些与工作相关的驾驶员群体比其他人更安全地驾驶行为。但是,迄今为止,尚无任何研究可比较应酬人员和志愿工作相关驾驶员的驾驶行为。因此,基于对发生与工作有关的驾驶的组织和社会环境的理论讨论,本研究假设,与有报酬的驾驶员相比,志愿者将报告更安全的驾驶行为。方法:一百零九十个有偿驾驶员和59名志愿者填写了一份自我报告的驾驶行为问卷。结果:这项假设得到了一些支持,因为志愿者报告的驾驶行为比有报酬的驾驶员更为安全。具体来说,志愿者报告的开车时注意力不集中和疲倦的情况少于有报酬的驾驶员。结论:结果表明,组织需要规范与工作相关的驾驶员的角色和职责,并更好地将驾驶纳入更广泛的职业健康与安全体系中。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号