首页> 外文期刊>San Joaquin Agricultural Law Review >AN ANALYSIS OF STATE PESTICIDE DRIFT LAWS REVISITED
【24h】

AN ANALYSIS OF STATE PESTICIDE DRIFT LAWS REVISITED

机译:修订后的国家杀虫剂漂移法分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Whether the various state laws governing pesticide drift have at least in part achieved their objectives of reducing human exposure and threats to the environment since the author last addressed this topic~1 is a fascinating research question. Unfortunately there has been no research over the past decade that has tested this hypothesis. Such research is costly and inherently difficult to conduct. There is no natural constituency that would support funding for research. Grants are generally made to address perceived problems, not to demonstrate that existing systems are achieving positive results (a form of publication bias). Indeed, given the polarization the subject has generated, any researcher that objectively addressed the question would likelybe attacked from some quarters for suggesting any improvement, and from other quarters for suggesting that major problems remain - hardly a secure route to either tenure or future funding.
机译:自从作者上次谈到这一主题以来,有关农药漂移的各种州法律是否至少部分实现了减少人类暴露和对环境的威胁的目标,这是一个有趣的研究问题。不幸的是,在过去的十年中,没有任何研究可以证明这一假设。这样的研究是昂贵的并且固有地难以进行。没有哪个自然界能够支持研究经费。通常会提供赠款来解决感知到的问题,而不是为了证明现有系统正在取得积极成果(一种出版偏见的形式)。确实,鉴于该主题产生的两极分化,任何客观地解决该问题的研究人员都可能会因某些方面提出任何改进建议而受到攻击,而由于其他方面暗示存在重大问题而可能受到其他方面的攻击-很难获得任期或未来资金的安全途径。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号