首页> 外文期刊>Schizophrenia bulletin >Structured assessment of violence risk in schizophrenia and other psychiatric disorders: a systematic review of the validity, reliability, and item content of 10 available instruments.
【24h】

Structured assessment of violence risk in schizophrenia and other psychiatric disorders: a systematic review of the validity, reliability, and item content of 10 available instruments.

机译:对精神分裂症和其他精神疾病的暴力风险进行结构化评估:系统评估10种可用工具的有效性,可靠性和项目内容。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

OBJECTIVES: To undertake a systematic review on structured violence risk assessment tools in individuals with schizophrenia. METHODS: A systematic search was conducted from 1990 to 2011 to identify violence risk assessment tools and studies examining their predictive validity. Item content of the identified instruments was analyzed, and areas under the curve (AUC) from the studies were extracted. In addition, an 11-item checklist was developed to assess the utility and psychometric properties of these tools. RESULTS: Ten risk assessment tools designed to predict community violence in psychiatric patients were identified, but only 2 studies reporting predictive validity estimates in patients with schizophrenia were found (median AUC = 0.69; interquartile range = 0.60-0.77). When inclusion criteria was broadened to include studies measuring accuracy for any diagnostic group, mixed evidence of predictive validity was found, with median AUCs ranging from 0.62 to 0.85 depending on the population. Item content included mostly clinical, sociodemographic, and criminal history factors. As only 1 tool included a neurobiological item, a structured review of brain-based and cognitive risk factors for violence was included, and 3 clusters (neurocognitive ability, neurocognitive awareness, and attitudinal cognition) were identified. CONCLUSIONS: While a number of violence risk assessment tools exist that can be used to predict the likelihood of community violence in psychiatric patients, there is currently little direct evidence for their utility in individuals with schizophrenia. In addition, there is large variation in item content between instruments, and further research is necessary to determine whether the inclusion of alternative factors could improve risk assessment.
机译:目的:对精神分裂症患者的结构性暴力风险评估工具进行系统的审查。方法:从1990年至2011年进行了系统的搜索,以确定暴力风险评估工具和研究其预测效度的研究。分析识别出的仪器的项目内容,并提取研究中的曲线下面积(AUC)。此外,还开发了一个11项清单,以评估这些工具的效用和心理计量学特性。结果:确定了十种旨在预测精神病患者社区暴力的风险评估工具,但仅发现2篇报告了精神分裂症患者的预测效度评估的研究(中位AUC = 0.69;四分位间距= 0.60-0.77)。当纳入标准扩大到包括对任何诊断组的准确性进行测量的研究时,发现了预测有效性的混合证据,根据人群的不同,AUC的中位数范围为0.62至0.85。项目内容主要包括临床,社会人口统计学和犯罪史因素。由于只有1种工具包括神经生物学项目,因此对脑部暴力的基于脑和认知的危险因素进行了结构性综述,并鉴定出3个类群(神经认知能力,神经认知意识和态度认知)。结论:尽管存在许多暴力风险评估工具可用于预测精神病患者社区暴力的可能性,但目前尚无直接证据证明其可用于精神分裂症患者。此外,不同工具之间的项目内容也存在很大差异,因此有必要进行进一步的研究以确定包括替代因素是否可以改善风险评估。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号