...
首页> 外文期刊>SAE International Journal of Passenger Cars - Mechanical Systems >Fleetwide Safety Benefits of Production Forward Collision and Lane Departure Warning Systems
【24h】

Fleetwide Safety Benefits of Production Forward Collision and Lane Departure Warning Systems

机译:生产前撞和车道偏离预警系统的全车安全优势

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Forward Collision Warning (FCW) and Lane Departure Warning (LDW) systems are two active safety systems that have recently been added to the U.S. New Car Assessment Program (NCAP) evaluation. Vehicles that pass confirmation tests may advertise the presence of FCW and LDW alongside the vehicle's star safety rating derived from crash tests. This paper predicts the number of crashes and injured drivers that could be prevented if all vehicles in the U.S. fleet were equipped with production FCW and/or LDW systems. Models of each system were developed using the test track data collected for 16 FCW and 10 LDW systems by the NCAP confirmation tests. These models were used in existing fleetwide benefits models developed for FCW and LDW. The 16 FCW systems evaluated could have potentially prevented between 9% and 53% of all rear-end collisions and prevented between 19% and 60% of injured (MAIS2+) drivers. Earlier warning times prevented more warnings and injuries. The lower operating speed thresholds of some systems also greatly affected benefits estimates. The results of this study suggest that future FCW testing protocols should also include low-speed warnings under 25 mph because of the potential safety benefits of these systems. For LDW systems, the 10 systems tested had similar benefits if distance to the lane marking was used as the metric for delivering the warning. For all vehicles, the number of crashes prevented varied from 29% to 32% and the number of injured (MAIS3+) drivers prevented varied from 25% to 27%. LDW benefits are more sensitive to Time to Lane Cross (TTLC) as a metric for warning delivery. The number of crashes varied from 13% to 47% and the number of injured drivers varied from 10% to 42% when TTLC was the metric used to deliver the LDW. This result suggests that future LDW tests should consider TTLC as a metric in addition to distance to lane cross.
机译:前撞警告(FCW)和车道偏离警告(LDW)系统是两个主动安全系统,最近已添加到美国新车评估计划(NCAP)评估中。通过确认测试的车辆可能会宣传FCW和LDW的存在,以及通过碰撞测试得出的星空星级。本文预测了如果美国车队中的所有车辆都配备了量产的FCW和/或LDW系统可以避免的撞车事故和受伤驾驶员的数量。使用NCAP确认测试收集的针对16个FCW和10个LDW系统的测试跟踪数据来开发每个系统的模型。这些模型用于为FCW和LDW开发的现有机队范围内的利益模型中。评估的16个FCW系统可以潜在地防止所有后端碰撞的9%至53%,并防止受伤(MAIS2 +)驾驶员的19%至60%。预警时间越早,警告和伤害就越少。一些系统的较低运行速度阈值也极大地影响了收益估算。这项研究的结果表明,由于这些系统的潜在安全优势,未来的FCW测试协议还应包括25 mph以下的低速警告。对于LDW系统,如果将到车道标记的距离用作传达警告的度量标准,则测试的10个系统具有类似的好处。对于所有车辆,预防的撞车次数从29%到32%不等,预防的受伤(MAIS3 +)驾驶员的数量从25%到27%不等。 LDW的优势对于穿越时间(TTLC)作为预警传递的度量标准更加敏感。当使用TTLC作为交付LDW的度量标准时,撞车次数从13%到47%不等,受伤驾驶员的数量从10%到42%不等。该结果表明,未来的LDW测试除了到车道交叉的距离外,还应考虑将TTLC作为度量标准。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号