首页> 外文期刊>Orthopedics >Benefit of Degenerative Posterior Longitudinal Ligament Removal During Anterior Decompression in Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy
【24h】

Benefit of Degenerative Posterior Longitudinal Ligament Removal During Anterior Decompression in Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy

机译:颈椎脊髓型颈椎病前路减压过程中去除后路纵韧带的益处

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

It remains controversial whether degenerative posterior longitudinal ligaments should be removed during anterior decompression procedures for cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Few data are available from studies that have compared removing and retaining the degenerative posterior longitudinal ligament. The goal of this retrospective study was to evaluate the benefit of degenerative posterior longitudinal ligament removal during such operations. Clinical data on 130 patients with confirmed degenerative posterior longitudinal ligament who underwent anterior cervical decompression surgery were retrospectively reviewed. All procedures were performed by the same senior orthopedic surgeon at the authors' spinal surgery center. The degenerative posterior longitudinal ligament was removed in 62 patients (group A) and retained in 68 patients (group B). The 130 patients were followed for 36 months. The Japanese Orthopedic Association score improved from 9.0 +/- 2.7 to 14.7 +/- 1.5 in group A and from 9.4 +/- 2.6 to 14.1 +/- 1.7 in group B (P=.028). The recovery rate for spinal cord neurologic function was 66.7% in group A and 61.3% in group B (P=.031). Operating time was longer (P=.002) and the sagittal median diameter of the vertebral canal was enhanced in group A (P<.001). Narrowing of previously enlarged canals occurred at a significantly higher rate in group B (P=.044). No significant difference was found in the rates of common complications between groups. Removal of the degenerative posterior longitudinal ligament in anterior decompression procedures for cervical spondylotic myelopathy appeared to be beneficial and provided more complete decompression and better postoperative outcomes than surgery without removal of the ligament. Although this procedure was generally safe, it required longer operating times, was more technically challenging, and required more experienced surgeons than surgery without removal of the ligament.
机译:对于颈椎病性脊髓病,在减压前应去除变性的后纵韧带还是有争议的。比较去除和保留变性后纵韧带的研究几乎没有数据。这项回顾性研究的目的是评估在此类手术中行变性后纵韧带切除术的益处。回顾性分析130例确诊的变性后纵韧带患者行颈椎前路减压手术的临床资料。所有程序均由作者的脊柱外科中心的同一位高级骨科医生完成。变性的后纵韧带在62例患者中被移除(A组),而在68例患者中被保留(B组)。这130名患者被随访36个月。日本骨科协会的评分从A组的9.0 +/- 2.7改善到14.7 +/- 1.5,B组的从9.4 +/- 2.6改善到14.1 +/- 1.7(P = .028)。 A组脊髓神经功能恢复率为66.7%,B组为61.3%(P = .031)。 A组手术时间更长(P = .002),椎管的矢状位中位直径增加(P <.001)。 B组中先前扩大的运河变窄的发生率显着更高(P = .044)。两组之间的常见并发症发生率没有显着差异。与不切除韧带的手术相比,在颈椎脊髓型颈椎病前路减压手术中去除变性后纵韧带似乎是有益的,并且可以提供更完全的减压效果和更好的术后效果。尽管此过程通常是安全的,但与不去除韧带的手术相比,它需要更长的手术时间,更具技术挑战性且需要经验丰富的外科医生。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号