首页> 外文期刊>Organization & environment >Greenwashing in Corporate Environmentalism Research and Practice: The Importance of What We Say and Do
【24h】

Greenwashing in Corporate Environmentalism Research and Practice: The Importance of What We Say and Do

机译:企业环保主义研究与实践中的绿色清洗:我们说和做的重要性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Barely a month goes by without another high-profile firm being accused of misleading commu- nications about environmental activities or performance. Already in 2014, Nestle has been called to account for promoting its customized recycling program for Nespresso disposable coffee pods, which has only a negligible overall waste reduction impact. Unilever has been subjected to a Twitter campaign alleging that its partnership with The Guardian newspaper to host a sustainable living online engagement platform did not accurately reflect the firm’s true environmental impacts. The frequency of similar problems, the high profile of the organizations involved, and the potentially damaging implications for the credibility of managers and researchers of organi- zations and natural environment motivated us to devote this collaborative editorial to the research frontiers and implications of corporate greenwashing, illustrating some of our ideas with the articles in this issue.
机译:几乎没有一个月过去了,没有另一家知名公司被指控对环境活动或绩效进行误导性宣传。雀巢早在2014年就已被要求负责推广针对Nespresso一次性咖啡包的定制回收计划,该计划对减少整体废物的影响微不足道。联合利华(Unilever)受到Twitter的指控,称其与《卫报》的合作伙伴关系,以托管一个可持续的在线生活互动平台,并未准确反映该公司的真实环境影响。类似问题的发生频率,所涉组织的知名度以及对组织和自然环境的管理人员和研究人员的信誉造成的潜在破坏性影响,促使我们将这一合作社论专门用于研究前沿和公司绿色清洗的影响,通过本期文章阐述我们的一些想法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号