首页> 外文期刊>Orthopedics >Posteromedial Versus Direct Posterior Approach for Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reinsertion
【24h】

Posteromedial Versus Direct Posterior Approach for Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reinsertion

机译:后内侧与直接后路入路后交叉韧带的重新插入

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Avulsion fractures of the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) are usually found in pediatric populations. This study investigated which of 2 approaches-posteromedial or direct posterior-enables easier PCL reinsertion. Ten fresh cadavers were studied using direct posterior (10 knees) and posteromedial (10 knees) approaches. In both, a guidewire was inserted into the tibial insertion of the PCL as perpendicular as possible to the coronal knee axis. Then, the angle between the guidewire and the horizontal plane of the table was measured. The mean angle of the guidewire was 8.6 degrees (SD=7.3 degrees) with the direct posterior approach and 36.6 degrees (SD=14.3 degrees) with the posteromedial approach (P=.005). The direct posterior approach allows a greater degree of freedom compared with the posteromedial approach to reach the PCL tibial insertion.
机译:后交叉韧带撕脱性骨折通常在儿科人群中发现。这项研究调查了2种方法中的哪种方法(后内侧或直接后部使PCL更容易插入)。使用直接后路(10膝)和后内侧(10膝)方法研究了十只新鲜尸体。在这两种方法中,将一根导线尽可能垂直于冠状膝关节轴插入PCL的胫骨插入物中。然后,测量导丝与工作台的水平面之间的角度。直接后路入路的导丝平均角度为8.6度(SD = 7.3度),后内侧入路的平均角度为36.6度(SD = 14.3度)(P = .005)。与后内侧入路相比,直接后入路可实现更大的自由度以达到PCL胫骨插入。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号