...
【24h】

Models of care for the secondary prevention of osteoporotic fractures: A systematic review and meta-analysis

机译:骨质疏松性骨折的二级预防护理模式:系统评价和荟萃分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Most people presenting with incident osteoporotic fractures are neither assessed nor treated for osteoporosis to reduce their risk of further fractures, despite the availability of effective treatments. We evaluated the effectiveness of published models of care for the secondary prevention of osteoporotic fractures. We searched eight medical literature databases to identify reports published between 1996 and 2011, describing models of care for secondary fracture prevention. Information extracted from each publication included study design, patient characteristics, identification strategies, assessment and treatment initiation strategies, as well as outcome measures (rates of bone mineral density (BMD) testing, osteoporosis treatment initiation, adherence, re-fractures and cost-effectiveness). Meta-analyses of studies with valid control groups were conducted for two outcome measures: BMD testing and osteoporosis treatment initiation. Out of 574 references, 42 articles were identified as analysable. These studies were grouped into four general models of care - type A: identification, assessment and treatment of patients as part of the service; type B: similar to A, without treatment initiation; type C: alerting patients plus primary care physicians; and type D: patient education only. Meta-regressions revealed a trend towards increased BMD testing (p = 0.06) and treatment initiation (p = 0.03) with increasing intensity of intervention. One type A service with a valid control group showed a significant decrease in re-fractures. Types A and B services were cost-effective, although definition of cost-effectiveness varied between studies. Fully coordinated, intensive models of care for secondary fracture prevention are more effective in improving patient outcomes than approaches involving alerts and/or education only. ? 2012 International Osteoporosis Foundation and National Osteoporosis Foundation.
机译:尽管有有效的治疗方法,但大多数没有发生骨质疏松性骨折的人都没有接受骨质疏松症的评估或治疗,以降低他们进一步骨折的风险。我们评估了已发表的护理模型对骨质疏松性骨折的二级预防的有效性。我们检索了八个医学文献数据库,以鉴定1996年至2011年之间发表的报告,这些报告描述了继发性骨折预防的护理模型。从各出版物中摘录的信息包括研究设计,患者特征,识别策略,评估和治疗起始策略,以及结局指标(骨矿物质密度(BMD)测试,骨质疏松症治疗起始,依从性,再骨折和成本效益) )。对有效对照组的研究进行了荟萃分析,以评估两种结果:BMD检测和骨质疏松治疗的开始。在574篇参考文献中,有42篇文章被鉴定为可分析的。这些研究分为四种一般护理模式-A型:作为服务一部分的患者识别,评估和治疗; B型:与A相似,无治疗开始; C型:提醒患者和初级保健医生; D型:仅患者教育。荟萃回归显示,随着干预强度的增加,BMD测试(p = 0.06)和治疗开始(p = 0.03)呈增加趋势。具有有效对照组的一种A型服务显示再次骨折的明显减少。 A型和B型服务具有成本效益,尽管成本效益的定义因研究而异。与仅涉及警报和/或教育的方法相比,用于继发性骨折预防的全面协调,强化护理模型在改善患者预后方面更为有效。 ? 2012年国际骨质疏松基金会和国家骨质疏松基金会。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号