...
【24h】

Discriminative value of FRAX for fracture prediction in a cohort of Chinese postmenopausal women

机译:FRAX在中国绝经后女性队列预测中的鉴别价值

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

We followed 2,266 postmenopausal Chinese women for 4.5 years to determine which model best predicts osteoporotic fracture. A model that contains ethnic-specific risk factors, some of which reflect frailty, performed as well as or better than the well-established FRAX model. Introduction: Clinical risk assessment, with or without T-score, can predict fractures in Chinese postmenopausal women although it is unknown which combination of clinical risk factors is most effective. This prospective study sought to compare the accuracy for fracture prediction using various models including FRAX, our ethnic-specific clinical risk factors (CRF) and other simple models. Methods: This study is part of the Hong Kong Osteoporosis Study. A total of 2,266 treatment na?ve postmenopausal women underwent clinical risk factor and bone mineral density assessment. Subjects were followed up for outcome of major osteoporotic fracture and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves for different models were compared. The percentage of subjects in different quartiles of risk according to various models who actually fractured was also compared. Results: The mean age at baseline was 62.1 ± 8.5 years and mean follow-up time was 4.5 ± 2.8 years. A total of 106 new major osteoporotic fractures were reported, of which 21 were hip fractures. Ethnic-specific CRF with T-score performed better than FRAX with T-score (based on both Chinese normative and National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) databases) in terms of AUC comparison for prediction of major osteoporotic fracture. The two models were similar in hip fracture prediction. The ethnic-specific CRF model had a 10% higher sensitivity than FRAX at a specificity of 0.8 or above. Conclusion: CRF related to frailty and differences in lifestyle between populations are likely to be important in fracture prediction. Further work is required to determine which and how CRF can be applied to develop a fracture prediction model in our population.
机译:我们追踪了2266名绝经后的中国女性4.5年,以确定哪种模型最能预测骨质疏松性骨折。该模型包含特定于种族的风险因素,其中一些因素反映了脆弱性,其表现与公认的FRAX模型一样好或更好。简介:有或没有T评分的临床风险评估可以预测中国绝经后妇女的骨折,尽管尚不清楚哪种临床风险因素最有效。这项前瞻性研究试图使用各种模型(包括FRAX,我们的种族特异性临床危险因素(CRF)和其他简单模型)比较骨折预测的准确性。方法:该研究是香港骨质疏松研究的一部分。共有2266名初次绝经后治疗的妇女接受了临床危险因素和骨矿物质密度评估。对受试者进行重大骨质疏松性骨折的随访,并比较不同模型的受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线。还比较了根据实际骨折的各种模型处于不同风险四分位数的受试者所占的百分比。结果:基线时的平均年龄为62.1±8.5岁,平均随访时间为4.5±2.8年。总共报告了106例新的主要骨质疏松性骨折,其中21例为髋部骨折。在预测主要骨质疏松性骨折的AUC比较方面,具有T评分的特定种族CRF优于具有T评分的FRAX(基于中国规范性和国家卫生与营养检查调查(NHANES)数据库)。两种模型在髋部骨折预测中相似。在0.8或更高的特异性下,特定于种族的CRF模型的灵敏度比FRAX高10%。结论:与体弱相关的CRF和人群之间生活方式的差异可能在骨折预测中很重要。需要进一步的工作来确定哪些CRF以及如何应用CRF来开发我们人群中的骨折预测模型。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号