首页> 外文期刊>Organic Agriculture >Intake, feed conversion efficiency and grazing behaviour of two Holstein cow strains in a pasture-based production system under organic farming in Switzerland
【24h】

Intake, feed conversion efficiency and grazing behaviour of two Holstein cow strains in a pasture-based production system under organic farming in Switzerland

机译:瑞士有机耕种的牧场生产系统中两种荷斯坦奶牛的摄入量,饲料转化效率和放牧行为

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Better efficiency of herbage utilisation by dairy cows even under organic condition needs more attention. Therefore, Holstein-Friesian dairy cows of New Zealand (HNZ) and Swiss origin (HCH) were compared in a pasture-based, seasonal calving system onan organic farm. During the 3-year investigation intake on pasture, feed conversion efficiency, grazing behaviour and physical activity of cows were compared. The HNZ were lighter (521 vs. 608 kg, P< 0.001) and showed a higher body condition score (2.9 vs. 2.6, P<0.001) compared to HCH. Furthermore, the HNZ produced less energy-corrected milk (18.2 vs. 21.3 kg/ day/cow, P<0.001) and had a lower total intake than HCH (14.6 vs. 16.7 kg dry matter (DM)/day/cow, /’<0.001). No differences occurred between strains concerning herbage intake (13.0 vs. 12.8 kg DM/ 100 kg body weight (BW)~(0.75)/day, P=0.50) and total intake (13.4 vs. 13.6 kg DM/100 kg BW~(0.75)/day, P=0.52) relative to the metabolic body weight as well as for the short-term feed conversion efficiency (1.29 vs.1.34 kg/kg, P=0.22). Cows of both strains grazed equally long (571 vs. 582 min/day, P=0.25). The HNZ ruminated longer (507 vs. 474 min day, P<0.001) than HCH. No differences were found between strains regarding the number of rumination boli (577 vs. 556/day, P=0.34) and of mastications per rumination bolus (60 vs. 59, P=0.66). Further, no differences occurred concerning physical activity. Pertaining to grazing around dung patches, no differences were observed between strains. Striking differences in grazing behaviour were not observed, except prolonged rumination per day for HNZ, but this had no apparent effect on the feed conversion efficiency.
机译:即使在有机条件下,奶牛更好地利用牧草也需要更多关注。因此,在有机农场的牧场式季节性产犊系统中比较了新西兰的荷斯坦-弗里斯兰奶牛(HNZ)和瑞士的奶牛(HCH)。在为期3年的牧场调查中,比较了母牛的饲料转化效率,放牧行为和身体活动。与HCH相比,HNZ较轻(521 vs. 608 kg,P <0.001),并显示出较高的身体状况评分(2.9 vs. 2.6,P <0.001)。此外,HNZ生产的能量校正奶量较少(18.2比21.3千克/天/牛,P <0.001),总摄入量低于六六六(14.6比16.7千克干物质(DM)/天/牛,/ '<0.001)。牧草摄入量(13.0 vs. 12.8 kg DM / 100 kg体重(BW)〜(0.75)/天,P = 0.50)和总摄入量(13.4 vs. 13.6 kg DM / 100 kg BW〜()之间没有差异相对于代谢体重以及短期饲料转化效率(1.29 vs.1.34 kg / kg,P = 0.22)为0.75)/天,P = 0.52)。两种品系的母牛均等长放牧(571 vs. 582 min / day,P = 0.25)。 HNZ的反刍作用比HCH更长(507天比474分钟,P <0.001)。菌株之间的反刍玻利虫数量(577 vs. 556 /天,P = 0.34)和每个反刍推注的咀嚼量(60 vs. 59,P = 0.66)之间没有差异。此外,在体育锻炼方面没有差异。与粪便周围的放牧有关,菌株之间未观察到差异。没有观察到放牧行为的显着差异,除了HNZ每天的反刍作用延长外,这对饲料转化效率没有明显影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号