...
首页> 外文期刊>Osteoarthritis and cartilage >A case report: Reconstruction of a damaged knee following treatment of giant cell tumor of the proximal tibia with cryosurgery and cementation.
【24h】

A case report: Reconstruction of a damaged knee following treatment of giant cell tumor of the proximal tibia with cryosurgery and cementation.

机译:病例报告:冷冻和骨水泥治疗胫骨近端巨细胞瘤后重建膝关节受损。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Objective Reconstruction of a knee damaged by cement packed to cure a giant-cell tumor is sometimes difficult. We reconstructed such a knee by removal of the cement, autologous bone transplantation and distraction osteogenesis using the Ilizarov apparatus. In this paper the results 29 months after the salvage surgery are given.Patient and Methods We saw a 31-year-old woman's knee joint that showed osteoarthritic change after curettage, cryosurgery and cementation performed 4 years previously for a giant-cell tumor of the proximal tibia. We reconstructed the knee joint. This procedure included cement removal, alignment correction by tibial osteotomy, subchondral bone reconstruction by autologous bone transplantation, and filling the defect after removing the bone cement by elongating the diaphysis using the Ilizarov apparatus.Results Distraction was terminated 4 months later when 54 mm of elongation was performed. All devices were removed 12 months after the surgery. Seventeen months after the removal of the apparatus, the range of motion of the right knee was 0 degrees extension and 110 degrees flexion, and the patient was able to walk without pain.Conclusions Although the treatment period is long and there may be some complications of Ilizarov lengthening and distraction osteogenesis, this procedure has numerous benefits. Bony defects can be soundly reconstructed and, at the same time, the alignment of the knee can be corrected. Also it is not necessary to reconstruct the ligaments because the insertions are intact. If osteoarthritis progresses, a surface type total knee replacement can be performed, not constrained type prosthesis, which would be used if the bony structure had not been reconstructed. This procedure may be one of the candidates for reconstructing such knee joints destroyed by bone cement. Copyright 2002 OsteoArthritis Research Society International. Published by Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:目的有时候,用水泥填充来修复巨细胞瘤的水泥损坏的膝盖很难重建。我们通过使用Ilizarov器械去除水泥,自体骨移植和牵引成骨术重建了这种膝盖。在本文中,我们给出了挽救手术后29个月的结果。病人和方法我们观察了一名31岁妇女的膝关节,在4年前行刮除,冷冻手术和骨水泥化手术后,该患者的膝关节显示出骨关节炎的改变。胫骨近端。我们重建了膝关节。该过程包括去除骨水泥,通过胫骨截骨术进行矫正,通过自体骨移植重建软骨下骨,以及使用Ilizarov器械通过延长骨干来去除骨水泥后填补缺损。结果4个月后,当延伸54毫米时,牵引停止被执行了。手术后12个月,所有设备均被移除。取出器械十七个月后,右膝的活动范围为0度伸展和110度屈曲,患者能够行走而没有疼痛。结论尽管治疗期长,并且可能会出现一些并发症。 Ilizarov延长和分散成骨作用,此程序有许多好处。可以很好地重建骨缺损,同时可以校正膝盖的对齐方式。另外,由于插入物是完整的,因此不必重建韧带。如果骨关节炎进展,可以进行表面型全膝关节置换术,而不是约束型假体,如果没有重建骨结构,则可以使用。该程序可能是重建这种被骨水泥破坏的膝关节的候选方法之一。版权所有2002 OsteoArthritis Research Society International。由Elsevier Science Ltd.出版。保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号