...
首页> 外文期刊>Osteoarthritis and cartilage >Symptomatic efficacy and safety of diacerein in the treatment of osteoarthritis: a meta-analysis of randomized placebo-controlled trials.
【24h】

Symptomatic efficacy and safety of diacerein in the treatment of osteoarthritis: a meta-analysis of randomized placebo-controlled trials.

机译:双醋瑞因在治疗骨关节炎中的症状功效和安全性:一项随机安慰剂对照试验的荟萃分析。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the efficacy and safety of diacerein as a pain-reducing agent in the treatment of osteoarthritis (OA), using meta-analysis of published randomized placebo-controlled trials (RCTs). METHODS: Systematic searches of the bibliographic databases Medline, Embase, Cinahl, Chemical Abstracts, Cochrane and Web of Science for RCTs concerning diacerein treatment of OA. Inclusion criteria: explicit statement about randomization to either diacerein or placebo, and co-primary outcomes being reduction in pain and improvement in function. Efficacy effect size (ES) was estimated using Hedges's standardized mean difference. Safety was measured via the risk ratio (RR) of patients having at least one episode of diarrhoea, or withdrawal due to adverse events. Trials were combined by using random-effects meta-analysis. Consistency was evaluated via the I-squared index. RESULTS: Six trials (seven sub-studies; 1533 patients) contributed to the meta-analysis, revealing a large degree of inconsistency among the trials (I(2)=56%) in regard to pain reduction: the combined ES was -0.24 [95% confidence intervals (CI): -0.39 to -0.08, P=0.003], favouring diacerein. The statistically significant improvement in function (P=0.01) was based on a small amount of heterogeneity (I(2)=11%), but presented a questionable clinical effect size (ES=-0.14). Risk of publication bias could not be excluded, and trials with duration of more than 6 months did not favour diacerein. There was an increased risk of diarrhoea with diacerein (RR=3.51 [2.55-4.83], P<0.0001), and some withdrawal from therapy following adverse events (RR=1.58 [1.05-2.36], P=0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Diacerein may be an alternative therapy for OA for patients who cannot take paracetamol or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) because of adverse effects or lack of benefit. However, it is associated with increased risk of diarrhoea, and the symptomatic benefit after 6 months remains unknown.
机译:目的:使用已发表的随机安慰剂对照试验(RCT)的荟萃分析,评估双醋瑞因作为止痛药治疗骨关节炎(OA)的疗效和安全性。方法:系统检索书目数据库Medline,Embase,Cinahl,化学文摘,Cochrane和Web of Science,以获取有关双醋瑞因治疗OA的RCT的信息。纳入标准:明确声明随机分配至双醋瑞因或安慰剂,共同主要疗效是减轻疼痛和改善功能。使用Hedges的标准化均值差异估算疗效效果大小(ES)。通过至少一次腹泻或因不良事件而退出的患者的风险比(RR)来衡量安全性。通过使用随机效应荟萃分析将试验合并。通过I平方指数评估一致性。结果:6项试验(7个子研究; 1533例患者)参与了荟萃分析,显示这些试验在减轻疼痛方面存在很大的不一致(I(2)= 56%):合并的ES为-0.24 [95%置信区间(CI):-0.39至-0.08,P = 0.003],有利于双醋瑞因。功能上的统计学显着改善(P = 0.01)是基于少量的异质性(I(2)= 11%),但临床效果大小令人怀疑(ES = -0.14)。不能排除发表偏倚的风险,持续时间超过6个月的试验不利于双醋瑞因。双醋瑞因使腹泻的风险增加(RR = 3.51 [2.55-4.83],P <0.0001),并且在发生不良事件后退出治疗(RR = 1.58 [1.05-2.36],P = 0.03)。结论:对于因不良反应或获益不足而不能服用扑热息痛或非甾体抗炎药(NSAIDs)的患者,双醋瑞因可能是OA的替代疗法。但是,它与腹泻的风险增加有关,并且6个月后的症状获益仍然未知。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号