首页> 外文期刊>Ophthalmic epidemiology >Application of stochastic measurement models to visual function rating scale questionnaires.
【24h】

Application of stochastic measurement models to visual function rating scale questionnaires.

机译:随机测量模型在视觉功能评定量表中的应用。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

PURPOSE: To test hypotheses that low vision patient responses to visual function rating scale questionnaires conform to an additive conjoint structure and that the Likert score is a sufficient statistic for the latent patient trait; to compare results for two competing stochastic measurement models; and to determine if different questionnaires measure the same construct in low vision patients. METHODS: Visual function rating scale questionnaires were administered to 284 low vision subjects by telephone. Each subject was administered two of four questionnaires: ADVS, NEI VFQ-25 plus supplement, expanded VAQ, and VF-14. RESULTS: Data were analyzed with the Muraki item response model and the Andrich measurement model. The estimates of latent person, item, and response threshold measures from the two models are linearly related. The Muraki model produced a better overall fit to the item response data, the Andrich model produced a better fit to the average ratings for each person and item. Fit statistics for the Andrich model were proportional to the item-dependent discrimination parameter in the Muraki model. The ADVS was the most accurate measure and the NEI VFQ was the least. Reliability was similar for all four instruments. Person measures for each pair of instruments were linearly related indicating that all four instruments measured the same construct. The person measure estimate from the Andrich model is monotonic with the average rating. That relationship suggests a transformation of the Likert score that can correct the floor and ceiling effects in rating scale data. CONCLUSIONS: Patient responses to all four questionnaires conform to varying degrees to an additive conjoint structure. The Likert score is a sufficient statistic for the ADVS and the VAQ, but not for the NEI VFQ or VF-14. All four instruments measure the same construct in the low vision population, but they differ in measurement accuracy and precision.
机译:目的:检验以下假设:低视力患者对视觉功能等级量表的反应符合加性联合结构,并且李克特评分是潜在患者特征的足够统计量;比较两个竞争的随机测量模型的结果;并确定在低视力患者中是否使用不同的问卷来衡量相同的构成。方法:通过电话对284名弱视受试者进行视觉功能评定量表调查。每个受试者接受四个问卷中的两个:ADVS,NEI VFQ-25加上补充,扩展的VAQ和VF-14。结果:使用Muraki项目响应模型和Andrich测量模型对数据进行了分析。来自两个模型的潜在人员,项目和响应阈值度量的估计值线性相关。 Muraki模型对项目响应数据的总体拟合度更好,Andrich模型对每个人和项目的平均评分的拟合度更高。 Andrich模型的拟合统计量与Muraki模型中与项目相关的歧视参数成比例。 ADVS是最准确的度量,而NEI VFQ最小。四种仪器的可靠性相似。每对仪器的人员测量值呈线性相关,表明所有四个仪器都测量相同的构造。来自Andrich模型的人身估计是单调的,具有平均评分。这种关系暗示了李克特分数的一种转变,这种转变可以纠正评定量表数据中的上下限效应。结论:所有四份问卷的患者回答在不同程度上均符合加性联合结构。利克特分数对于ADVS和VAQ是足够的统计数据,但对于NEI VFQ或VF-14则不是。在弱视人群中,所有四种仪器都测量相同的构造,但是它们的测量精度和精确度不同。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号