首页> 外文期刊>Operative dentistry >Effect of curing mode on microtensile bond strength to dentin of two dual-cured adhesive systems in combination with resin luting cements for indirect restorations.
【24h】

Effect of curing mode on microtensile bond strength to dentin of two dual-cured adhesive systems in combination with resin luting cements for indirect restorations.

机译:固化方式对两种双固化胶粘剂系统与树脂胶合剂间接修复牙本质微拉伸粘合强度的影响。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This study evaluated the microtensile bond strength (microTBS) of dual-cured adhesive systems when the different components were either light activated or left in the uncured state prior to cementation of an indirect composite restoration. Occlusal dentin surfaces of 40 human third molars were flattened. The teeth were randomly assigned to 8 groups (n = 5) according to the dual-cured systems (bonding agents/resin cements) and curing modes: All Bond 2/Duolink (AB2-BISCO Inc) and Optibond Solo Plus Dual Cure/Nexus 2 (SOLO-Kerr). Resin cements were applied to pre-cured resin composite discs (2 mm thick/Z-250/3M ESPE), which were fixed to dentin surfaces containing adhesive resin in either cured (LP) or uncured states (SP). The restored teeth were light activated according to the manufacturers' instructions (LRC-XL3000/3M ESPE) or allowed to self-cure (SRC). The restored teeth were water-stored at 37 degrees C for 24 hours. They were then both mesial-distally and buccal-lingually sectioned to obtain bondedspecimens (1.2 mm2). Each specimen was tested in tension at a crosshead speed of 0.6 mm/minute until failure. Data (MPa (SD)) were analyzed by two-way ANOVA and Tukey's post-hoc test (p < .05). AB2/SP exhibited higher microTBS than AB2/LP (p = .00001); however, no significant differences were noted between SOLO/LP and SOLO/SP. Results suggested that dual-cured adhesive systems were as strong or even stronger when they were left in the uncured state prior to indirect resin composite cementation.
机译:这项研究评估了在间接复合修复物胶结之前,不同组分被光活化或处于未固化状态时,双固化胶粘剂系统的微拉伸粘合强度(microTBS)。将40个人的第三磨牙的咬合牙本质表面弄平。根据双固化系统(粘合剂/树脂胶粘剂)和固化模式,将牙齿随机分为8组(n = 5):所有Bond 2 / Duolink(AB2-BISCO Inc)和Optibond Solo Plus Dual Cure / Nexus 2(SOLO-Kerr)。将树脂胶粘剂涂覆到预固化的树脂复合材料圆盘(2毫米厚/ Z-250 / 3M ESPE)上,将其固定到包含固化(LP)或未固化(SP)状态的粘合树脂的牙本质表面。修复后的牙齿根据制造商的说明(LRC-XL3000 / 3M ESPE)进行了光活化处理,或者可以进行自我修复(SRC)。将恢复的牙齿在37℃下储水24小时。然后将它们分别进行近中和颊舌切面,以获得粘合标本(1.2平方毫米)。以0.6mm /分钟的十字头速度对每个样品进行张力测试直至失效。通过双向方差分析和Tukey事后检验分析数据(MPa(SD))(p <.05)。 AB2 / SP的microTBS高于AB2 / LP(p = .00001);但是,SOLO / LP和SOLO / SP之间没有显着差异。结果表明,在间接树脂复合胶结之前,双固化胶粘剂体系处于未固化状态时,其强度甚至更高。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号