...
首页> 外文期刊>Ophthalmology >Diagnostic Distinctions and Genetic Analysis of Patients Diagnosed with Moebius Syndrome
【24h】

Diagnostic Distinctions and Genetic Analysis of Patients Diagnosed with Moebius Syndrome

机译:诊断为莫比乌斯综合征的患者的诊断区别和遗传分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Objective: To improve diagnostic assessment in Moebius syndrome by (1) creating more selective diagnostic subgroups and (2) conducting genetic evaluation in a large patient cohort.Design: Prospective, observational study.Participants: Attendees of 3 consecutive Moebius syndrome conferences held in the United States, with a prior diagnosis of Moebius syndrome, were invited to participate.Methods: Participants underwent standardized ophthalmologic examination for Moebius syndrome minimum diagnostic criteria (MDC) (congenital, nonprogressive facial palsy, and abduction deficit) and genetic testing for H0XA1, H0XB1, and TUBB3 mutations.Main Outcome Measures: The number of patients meeting MDC and the number of patients with confirmed genetic mutation.Results: A total of 112 participants from 107 families enrolled. Nineteen percent of participants (21/112) did not meet accepted MDC for Moebius syndrome because they had abduction deficits without facial palsy or facial palsy with full ocular motility. All 5 families with 2 affected individuals had at least 1 family member in this category, including 2 siblings with comitant strabismus who harbored a HOXB1 mutation. Four unrelated participants, also not meeting MDC, had large-angle exotropia, vertical gaze deficiency, and ptosis consistent with congenital fibrosis of the extraocular muscles type 3 (CFEOM3); 1 patient harbored a novel TUBB3 mutation, and 3 patients harbored previously reported de novo TUBB3 mutations. Three percent of participants (3/112) met MDC but also had restricted vertical gaze. The remaining 88 participants (79%) met MDC and had full vertical gaze. This group had relatively homogeneous findings, and none had a family history of Moebius syndrome. Two previously undescribed phenomena were observed in this category: (1) volitional Bell's phenomenon and (2) intorsion with fixation.Conclusions: Although the genetic contributors to classic Moebius syndrome remain elusive, accuracy in clinical evaluation will properly subdivide patients to facilitate genetic testing as new candidate genes are identified. Failure to test ocular motility may lead to misdiagnosis of Moebius syndrome, especially in patients who have facial palsy with full ductions. Patients with exotropia, vertical gaze limitation, and ptosis do not have classic Moebius syndrome and may have TUBB3 mutations associated with CFEOM3. To optimize genetic analysis, we propose adding "full vertical motility" to the MDC for Moebius syndrome.
机译:目的:通过(1)建立更多的选择性诊断亚组和(2)在大型患者队列中进行基因评估来改善Moebius综合征的诊断评估。方法:参与者对Moebius综合征最低诊断标准(MDC)(先天性,非进行性面神经麻痹和绑架缺陷)进行了标准化的眼科检查,并对H0XA1,H0XB1进行了基因检测主要结果:符合MDC的患者人数和经证实的遗传突变的患者人数。结果:共有107个家庭的112名参与者参加了研究。 19%(21/112)的参与者未达到Moebius综合征的公认MDC,因为他们的外展不足而没有面部麻痹或具有完全眼球运动的面部麻痹。所有5个有2个受影响个体的家庭均具有至少1个此类家庭成员,包括2个携带HOXB1突变的共同斜视兄弟姐妹。四个不相关的参与者,也没有达到MDC,他们的大眼斜视,垂直注视不足和上睑下垂与3型眼外肌先天性纤维化相一致(CFEOM3); 1例患者携带新的TUBB3突变,3例患者接受先前报道的从头TUBB3突变。 3%(3/112)的参与者达到了MDC,但垂直视线也受到限制。其余88位参与者(79%)参加了MDC,并拥有完整的垂直注视。该组的发现相对均一,没有人有Moebius综合征的家族史。在该类别中观察到了两个以前未曾描述的现象:(1)自愿贝尔现象和(2)固定内固定。结论:尽管经典Moebius综合征的遗传因素仍然难以捉摸,但临床评估的准确性仍可适当细分患者,以方便进行基因检测。确定了新的候选基因。无法测试眼动性可能会导致Moebius综合征的误诊,尤其是对于面神经麻痹且完全引诱的患者。患有外斜视,垂直注视受限和上睑下垂的患者没有典型的Moebius综合征,可能患有与CFEOM3相关的TUBB3突变。为了优化遗传分析,我们建议在Moebius综合征的MDC中添加“完全垂直运动”。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号