...
首页> 外文期刊>Ophthalmology >Risk factors for incident myopia in Australian schoolchildren: The Sydney Adolescent Vascular and Eye Study
【24h】

Risk factors for incident myopia in Australian schoolchildren: The Sydney Adolescent Vascular and Eye Study

机译:澳大利亚小学生发生近视的危险因素:悉尼青少年血管和眼睛研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Purpose: To examine the risk factors for incident myopia in Australian schoolchildren. Design: Population-based, longitudinal cohort study. Participants: The Sydney Adolescent Vascular and Eye Study (SAVES) was a 5- to 6-year follow-up of the Sydney Myopia Study (SMS). At follow-up, 2103 children were reexamined: 892 (50.5%) from the younger cohort and 1211 (51.5%) from the older cohort. Of these, 863 in the younger cohort and 1196 in the older cohort had complete refraction data. Methods: Cycloplegic autorefraction (cyclopentolate 1%; Canon RK-F1; Canon, Tokyo, Japan) was measured at baseline and follow-up. Myopia was defined as a spherical equivalent refraction of ≤-0.50 diopters (D). Children were classified as having incident myopia if they were nonmyopic at baseline and myopic in either eye at follow-up. A comprehensive questionnaire determined the amount of time children spent outdoors and doing near work per week at baseline, as well as ethnicity, parental myopia, and socioeconomic status. Main Outcome Measures: Incident myopia. Results: Children who became myopic spent less time outdoors compared with children who remained nonmyopic (younger cohort, 16.3 vs. 21.0 hours, respectively, P < 0.0001; older cohort, 17.2 vs. 19.6 hours, respectively, P=0.001). Children who became myopic performed significantly more near work (19.4 vs. 17.6 hours; P=0.02) in the younger cohort, but not in the older cohort (P=0.06). Children with 1 or 2 parents who were myopic had greater odds of incident myopia (1 parent: odds ratio [OR], 3.2, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.9-5.2; both parents: OR, 3.3, 95% CI, 1.6-6.8) in the younger but not the older cohort. Children of East Asian ethnicity had a higher incidence of myopia compared with children of European Caucasian ethnicity (both P < 0.0001) and spent less time outdoors (both P < 0.0001). A less hyperopic refraction at baseline was the most significant predictor of incident myopia. The addition of time outdoors, near work, parental myopia, and ethnicity to the model significantly improved the predictive power (P < 0.0001) in the younger cohort but had little effect in the older cohort. Conclusions: Time spent outdoors was negatively associated with incident myopia in both age cohorts. Near work and parental myopia were additional significant risk factors for myopia only in the younger cohort. Financial Disclosure(s): The author(s) have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.
机译:目的:探讨澳大利亚学童发生近视的危险因素。设计:基于人群的纵向队列研究。参与者:悉尼青少年血管和眼睛研究(SAVES)是对悉尼近视研究(SMS)进行的5至6年的随访。在随访中,对2103名儿童进行了重新检查:年轻队列中的892名(50.5%),年龄较大组的1211名(51.5%)。其中,年轻队列中的863人和老年队列中的1196人具有完整的折射数据。方法:在基线和随访时测量了腿部自屈(环戊酸酯1%;佳能RK-F1;佳能,日本东京)。近视定义为≤-0.50屈光度(D)的球面等效屈光度。如果儿童在基线时是非近视眼,在随访时两只眼睛是近视眼,则被分类为近视。一份全面的调查表确定了儿童在基线每周在户外度过的时间和每周接近工作的时间,以及种族,父母的近视和社会经济状况。主要结果指标:近视事件。结果:与近视儿童相比,近视儿童在户外度过的时间更少(较年轻的队列分别为16.3和21.0小时,P <0.0001;较老的队列分别为17.2和19.6小时,P = 0.001)。近视儿童在较年轻的队列中的近距离工作时间要长得多(19.4比17.6小时; P = 0.02),而在较远的队列中则没有(P = 0.06)。有1个或2个父母的近视儿童发生近视的几率更高(1个父母:优势比[OR],3.2,95%置信区间[CI],1.9-5.2;父母双方:OR,3.3,95%CI, 1.6-6.8),但年龄较小的人群则没有。与欧洲白种人相比,东亚族裔儿童的近视发生率更高(均为P <0.0001),而在户外度过的时间更少(均为P <0.0001)。基线时远视屈光较小是近视入射的最重要预测指标。该模型增加了户外活动时间,近班工作时间,父母近视和种族,这显着提高了年轻队列的预测能力(P <0.0001),但对老年队列几乎没有影响。结论:在两个年龄组中,在户外度过的时间与近视的发生负相关。仅在年轻人群中,近班和父母近视是造成近视的其他重要危险因素。财务披露:作者对本文讨论的任何材料均没有所有权或商业利益。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号