首页> 外文期刊>Ophthalmology >Ocular blast injuries in mass-casualty incidents: The marathon bombing in Boston, Massachusetts, and the fertilizer plant explosion in west, Texas
【24h】

Ocular blast injuries in mass-casualty incidents: The marathon bombing in Boston, Massachusetts, and the fertilizer plant explosion in west, Texas

机译:大规模伤亡事件中的眼部爆炸伤害:马萨诸塞州波士顿的马拉松炸弹袭击和德克萨斯州西部的化肥厂爆炸

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose To report the ocular injuries sustained by survivors of the April 15, 2013, Boston Marathon bombing and the April 17, 2013, fertilizer plant explosion in West, Texas. Design Multicenter, cross-sectional, retrospective, comparative case series. Participants Seventy-two eyes of 36 patients treated at 12 institutions were included in the study. Methods Ocular and systemic trauma data were collected from medical records. Main Outcome Measures Types and severity of ocular and systemic trauma and associations with mechanisms of injury. Results In the Boston cohort, 164 of 264 casualties were transported to level 1 trauma centers, and 22 (13.4%) required ophthalmology consultations. In the West cohort, 218 of 263 total casualties were transported to participating centers, of which 14 (6.4%) required ophthalmology consultations. Boston had significantly shorter mean distances to treating facilities (1.6 miles vs. 53.6 miles; P = 0.004). Overall, rigid eye shields were more likely not to have been provided than to have been provided on the scene (P<0.001). Isolated upper body and facial wounds were more common in West largely because of shattered windows (75.0% vs. 13.6%; P = 0.001), resulting in more open-globe injuries (42.9% vs. 4.5%; P = 0.008). Patients in Boston sustained more lower extremity injuries because of the ground-level bomb. Overall, 27.8% of consultations were called from emergency rooms, whereas the rest occurred afterward. Challenges in logistics and communications were identified. Conclusions Ocular injuries are common and potentially blinding in mass-casualty incidents. Systemic and ocular polytrauma is the rule in terrorism, whereas isolated ocular injuries are more common in other calamities. Key lessons learned included educating the public to stay away from windows during disasters, promoting use of rigid eye shields by first responders, the importance of reliable communications, deepening the ophthalmology call algorithm, the significance of visual incapacitation resulting from loss of spectacles, improving the rate of early detection of ocular injuries in emergency departments, and integrating ophthalmology services into trauma teams as well as maintaining a voice in hospital-wide and community-based disaster planning.
机译:目的报告2013年4月15日波士顿马拉松爆炸案和2013年4月17日德克萨斯州西部化肥厂爆炸给幸存者造成的眼部伤害。设计多中心,横截面,回顾性,比较案例系列。参与者本研究包括在12个机构中接受治疗的36例患者的72只眼。方法从病历中收集眼外伤资料。主要指标眼部和全身性创伤的类型和严重程度以及与损伤机制的关系。结果在波士顿队列中,264名伤员中有164名被转移到了1级创伤中心,有22名(13.4%)需要眼科咨询。在西部地区,总共263名伤亡者中有218名被运送到了参与中心,其中14名(6.4%)需要进行眼科咨询。波士顿到治疗机构的平均距离明显较短(1.6英里vs. 53.6英里; P = 0.004)。总体而言,与现场相比,没有提供刚性眼罩的可能性更高(P <0.001)。在西方,孤立的上半身和面部伤口更为常见,主要是因为窗户破裂(75.0%比13.6%; P = 0.001),导致更多的裸眼受伤(42.9%比4.5%; P = 0.008)。波士顿的病人由于地面炸弹而遭受了更多的下肢伤害。总体而言,有27.8%的咨询是从急诊室进行的,其余的则是随后进行的。确定了后勤和通信方面的挑战。结论眼外伤是常见的,在大规模伤亡事故中有可能致盲。全身性和眼外伤是恐怖主义的普遍现象,而孤立的眼外伤在其他灾难中更为常见。汲取的主要经验教训包括:在灾难期间教育公众远离窗户;促进急救人员使用硬性眼罩;可靠通信的重要性;加深眼科检查算法的重要性;因眼镜损失而导致视力丧失的重要性;急诊部门眼部损伤的早期发现率,将眼科服务整合到创伤小组中,以及在医院范围内和社区性灾难规划中保持发言权。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号