首页> 外文期刊>Obesity research >A randomized clinical trial testing treatment preference and two dietary options in behavioral weight management: preliminary results of the impact of diet at 6 months--PREFER study.
【24h】

A randomized clinical trial testing treatment preference and two dietary options in behavioral weight management: preliminary results of the impact of diet at 6 months--PREFER study.

机译:在行为体重管理中进行治疗偏好和两种饮食选择的随机临床试验:6个月饮食影响的初步结果-PREFER研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVE: The PREFER study objectives were to examine potential differences in weight loss during a standard behavioral intervention between subjects assigned to one of two calorie- and fat-restricted diets [standard behavior treatment (SBT) and lacto-ovo-vegetarian ([SBT+LOV)], with or without regard to their preferred dietary treatment. This article reports the differences in outcomes between diet groups after the first 6 months of the intervention. RESEARCH METHODS AND PROCEDURES: The study used a four-group design. Subjects (n = 182) were randomized to a treatment preference group and then to a dietary treatment group. For this report, preference groups were combined to permit comparisons by dietary treatment only (SBT, n = 98; SBT+LOV, n = 84). Additional analyses compared SBT+LOV subjects who were 100% adherent (did not consume any meat, fish, or poultry, n = 47) to those who were <100% adherent (n = 24). RESULTS: Significant differences were seen in the baseline to 6-month change scores betweenthe two groups for carbohydrate consumption (p = 0.013), protein consumption (p < 0.001), polyunsaturated-to-saturated fat ratio (p = 0.009), and low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C) level (p = 0.013). Among SBT+LOV subjects, those who were 100% adherent experienced greater reductions in weight (p < 0.001), total cholesterol (p = 0.026), LDL-C (p = 0.034), and glucose (p = 0.002) and consumed less fat (p = 0.030) compared with those who were <100% adherent. DISCUSSION: Differences between dietary treatment groups at 6 months were minimal, most likely because one-third of the SBT+LOV group did not follow the vegetarian diet and because both groups had the same calorie and fat restrictions. SBT+LOV subjects who were 100% adherent were more successful at both weight loss and cholesterol reduction than those who were <100% adherent, suggesting that vegetarian diets are efficacious for weight and cholesterol control.
机译:目的:PREFER的研究目标是检查在分配两种卡路里和脂肪限制饮食之一的受试者(标准行为治疗(SBT)和乳卵-素食([SBT + LOV)],无论是否考虑他们的首选饮食治疗。本文报告了干预的头6个月后,饮食组之间的结局差异。研究方法和步骤:本研究采用四组设计。将受试者(n = 182)随机分为治疗偏爱组和饮食治疗组。在本报告中,偏好组被合并,仅允许通过饮食治疗进行比较(SBT,n = 98; SBT + LOV,n = 84)。进一步的分析比较了100%依从性(未食用任何肉类,鱼类或家禽,n = 47)与<100%依从性(n = 24)的SBT + LOV受试者。结果:两组之间在基线至6个月变化分数上的碳水化合物消耗量(p = 0.013),蛋白质消耗量(p <0.001),多不饱和与饱和脂肪比率(p = 0.009)和低水平之间存在显着差异-密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL-C)水平(p = 0.013)。在SBT + LOV受试者中,100%依从的受试者体重减轻(p <0.001),总胆固醇(p = 0.026),LDL-C(p = 0.034)和葡萄糖(p = 0.002)降低得更多,并且消耗较少脂肪(p = 0.030)与那些<100%依从性的人相比。讨论:饮食治疗组在6个月时的差异很小,这很可能是因为SBT + LOV组中的三分之一没有遵循素食,并且两组的卡路里和脂肪限制相同。坚持100%依从的SBT + LOV受试者在体重减轻和胆固醇降低方面均比那些<100%依从的受试者更为成功,这表明素食饮食对控制体重和胆固醇有效。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号