...
首页> 外文期刊>Ophthalmologica: International Journal of Ophthalmology=Journal International d'Ophtalmologie >Pars plana vitrectomy with internal limiting membrane peeling compared with intravitreal triamcinolone injection in the treatment of diabetic macular edema.
【24h】

Pars plana vitrectomy with internal limiting membrane peeling compared with intravitreal triamcinolone injection in the treatment of diabetic macular edema.

机译:与玻璃体内注射曲安西龙注射液相比,玻璃体玻璃体切除术内部限制膜剥离治疗糖尿病性黄斑水肿。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

AIM: To compare the efficacy of pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) with internal limiting membrane (ILM) removal and intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide (IVTA) injection in patients with diabetic macular edema (DME). METHODS: This study was a retrospective, comparative, interventional case study examining 14 patients (15 eyes in total) who underwent PPV and ILM removal (vitrectomy group), and 14 patients (14 eyes in total) who were treated with an IVTA injection (triamcinolone group). Main outcome measures were visual acuity and central macular thickness at 1, 3 and 6 months postoperatively. RESULTS: Patients in the vitrectomy group had significantly decreased central macular thicknesses at 1, 3 and 6 months postoperatively (p = 0.001, p = 0.001 and p = 0.002, respectively). The improvement in visual acuity was not significant at 1 month, but it gradually became statistically significant at 3 and 6 months after surgery (p = 0.031 and p = 0.015, respectively). Compared with the triamcinolone group, the vitrectomy group showed a better visual acuity at 6 months after surgery (p = 0.025). CONCLUSIONS: PPV combined with ILM removal is a good therapeutic option for improving visual acuity and decreasing macular thickness in DME, and this treatment has a better long-term efficacy than a single IVTA injection.
机译:目的:为了比较糖尿病性黄斑水肿(DME)患者的平面内玻璃体切除术(PPV)与内部限制膜(ILM)去除和玻璃体内注射曲安奈德(IVTA)的疗效。方法:本研究是一项回顾性比较性介入病例研究,检查了接受PPV和ILM切除的14例患者(总共15眼)(玻璃体切除术组),以及接受IVTA注射治疗的14例患者(总共14眼)(曲安西龙组)。主要结局指标为术后1、3和6个月的视敏度和中央黄斑厚度。结果:玻璃体切除术组的患者术后1、3和6个月中央黄斑中心厚度明显降低(分别为p = 0.001,p = 0.001和p = 0.002)。视力的改善在1个月时并不显着,但在手术后3个月和6个月时逐渐变得具有统计学意义(分别为p = 0.031和p = 0.015)。与曲安西龙组相比,玻璃体切除术组术后6个月的视力更好(p = 0.025)。结论:PPV联合ILM去除是改善DME的视敏度和减少黄斑厚度的良好治疗选择,并且这种治疗的长期疗效优于单次IVTA注射。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号