首页> 外文期刊>Oncology research and treatment. >A Questionnaire Study to Assess the Value of the Vulnerable Elders Survey, G8, and Predictors of Toxicity as: Screening Tools for Frailty and Toxicity in Geriatric Cancer Patients
【24h】

A Questionnaire Study to Assess the Value of the Vulnerable Elders Survey, G8, and Predictors of Toxicity as: Screening Tools for Frailty and Toxicity in Geriatric Cancer Patients

机译:一项问卷调查,以评估弱势老年人调查,G8和毒性预测因子的价值,作为:老年癌症患者虚弱性和毒性的筛选工具

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: The aim of this study was to identify an appropriate screening instrument for the identification of frail elderly patients in a tertiary cancer center. In order to improve cancer care for older patients, the use of a geriatric assessment (GA) has been proposed to identify frail patients or those who are at a higher risk for chemotherapy -related toxicities. In busy clinical routine, an appropriate screening instrument could be used to spare time- and resource-consuming application of GA. Patients and Methods: We administered the Vulnerable Elders Survey (VES-13), G8 questionnaire, and Predictors of Toxicity (POT) as well as a GA at the first visit of 84 consecutive patients at a single Comprehensive Cancer Center. Analysis for patients' characteristics as well as sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive value (npv) was conducted. Results: The median age of the patients was 73 years (range 63-93 years), 61.9% were male, most (63%) suffered from gastrointestinal tumors, 39.3% had a multiple cancer diagnosis, and 53.6% had metastasis. 30 (35.7%) individuals were classified as 'frail' by the GA. Sensitivity of G8 was 38.3%, and the npv was 63.8%. Sensitivity for VES-13 was 57.1%, and npv was 76.3%. Sensitivity of POT was 72.7%, and the npv was 80.6%. Conclusion: For the first time, the VES13, G8, and POT are compared in a sample of older German patients. The POT seems to be a sufficient screening tool to identify frail patients in a tertiary referral cancer center and helps to save time and resources compared with a complete GA. (C) 2016 S. Karger GmbH, Freiburg
机译:背景:本研究的目的是寻找一种合适的筛查工具,以鉴定三级癌症中心中体弱的老年患者。为了改善对老年患者的癌症护理,已提议使用老年医学评估(GA)来识别体弱的患者或化学疗法相关毒性较高的患者。在繁忙的临床程序中,可以使用适当的筛查仪器来节省GA的时间和资源消耗。患者和方法:我们在单个综合癌症中心对84位连续患者进行首次就诊时,进行了易受伤害的老年人调查(VES-13),G8问卷,毒性预测因子(POT)和GA。分析患者的特征以及敏感性,特异性以及阳性和阴性预测值(npv)。结果:患者的中位年龄为73岁(范围63-93岁),男性为61.9%,患有胃肠道肿瘤的大多数(63%),诊断为多发癌的为39.3%,并且有转移的为53.6%。通用航空将30人(35.7%)归类为“体弱”。 G8的灵敏度为38.3%,npv为63.8%。 VES-13的灵敏度为57.1%,npv为76.3%。 POT的灵敏度为72.7%,npv为80.6%。结论:首次比较了德国老年患者样本中的VES13,G8和POT。 POT似乎是一种足以识别三级转诊癌症中心体弱患者的筛查工具,与完整的GA相比,POT有助于节省时间和资源。 (C)2016 S.Karger GmbH,弗赖堡

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号