首页> 外文期刊>Biological Conservation >A comparison of taxonomic distinctness versus richness as criteria forsetting conservation priorities for North American birds
【24h】

A comparison of taxonomic distinctness versus richness as criteria forsetting conservation priorities for North American birds

机译:分类学独特性与丰富性的比较作为设定北美鸟类保护优先级的标准

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In choosing sites for a conservation reserve network, representation of the greatest number of species in the sites selected is a common objective. This approach implicitly assumes that all species have equal conservation value. An alternative objective is to represent the greatest genetic diversity in selected sites. This approach gives greater weight to species that are more genetically distinct. Such species tend to contain more unique genetic material, which would be lost if such species became extinct. In this paper, we calculate a diversity measure for a given set of species based on the branch length of the phylogenetic tree for the set. We use genetic distances between bird species in 147 genera based on the results of DNA hybridization research. Distribution information for bird species in the US comes from the Breeding Bird Survey. We compare resulting conservation reserve networks when the objective is the number of genera represented versus the diversity of genera represented. We find that the different objectives produce notably similar results.
机译:在为保护区网络选择地点时,代表所选地点中最大数量的物种是一个共同的目标。该方法隐含地假设所有物种都具有相同的保护价值。另一个目标是代表选定地点的最大遗传多样性。这种方法赋予具有更大遗传差异的物种更大的权重。这些物种往往包含更多独特的遗传物质,如果这些物种灭绝,这些物质将丢失。在本文中,我们根据给定物种集的系统发育树的分支长度,为其计算了多样性。根据DNA杂交研究的结果,我们使用147属鸟类之间的遗传距离。美国鸟类的分布信息来自“繁殖鸟类调查”。当目标是所代表的属的数量与所代表的属的多样性时,我们比较所得的自然保护区网络。我们发现不同的目标产生明显相似的结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号