...
首页> 外文期刊>Oil & gas science and technology >Contribution of the Steady State Method to Water Permeability Measurement in Very Low Permeability Porous Media
【24h】

Contribution of the Steady State Method to Water Permeability Measurement in Very Low Permeability Porous Media

机译:稳态方法对极低渗透率多孔介质中水渗透率测量的贡献

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Contribution of the Steady State Method to Water Permeability Measurement in Very Low Permeability Porous Media — Very low permeability geomaterials (order of nanoDarcy (10~(21) m~2)), such as clay rocks, are of interest for many industrial applications including production from unconventional reserves of oil and gas, CO2 geological storage and deep geological disposal of high-level long-lived radioactive waste. In these last two applications, the efficiency of clay, as a barrier, relies on their very low permeability. Yet, laboratory measurement of low permeability to water (below 100 nD (10~(-19) m~2)) remains a technical challenge. Some authors (Hsieh et al., 1981, Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. Geomech. Abstr. 18, 245-252) argue that steady state methods are irrelevant due to the time required to stabilize water fluxes in such low permeability media and prefer a transient technique called pulse decay. This study aims to perform and compare transient and steady state, techniques on three samples. Regarding the steady state method, a high precision pump was used to measure water flow rate through the sample. We show that with a suitable set-up, the steady state method enables us to measure a very low permeability of 0,8 nD (8x10~(-22) m~2) over a period of three days and 2.6 nD (2.6 X 10~(-21) m~2) over a period of one day. While the pulse decay test provides only an average estimate of the permeability for a comparable duration. Many issues are raised in pulse decay tests: determination of the reservoirs storage factor, micro leakage effects, determination of the initial pulse pressure, 2D mechanical effect. Contrary to the widespread belief that transient techniques are required to measure very low permeability, we show that direct steady state measurement of water permeability, with suitable equipments, can be much faster and more accurate than measurement by pulse decay. In fact, low water and rock compressibilities result in fast propagation of pressure wave and it cannot be argued that steady state conditions are not reachable in a reasonable amount of time. Still, pulse decay remains an interesting alternative to steady state methods when permeability is higher than 50 nD (5 x 10~(-20) m~2).
机译:稳态方法对渗透率非常低的多孔介质中水渗透率测量的贡献—渗透率非常低的土工材料(nanoDarcy(10〜(21)m〜2)的数量),例如粘土岩石,在许多工业应用中都引起关注非常规油气储量生产,CO2地质储藏和高水平长寿命放射性废物的深部地质处置。在这最后两个应用中,粘土作为屏障的效率取决于其极低的渗透性。然而,实验室对低渗透率(低于100 nD(10〜(-19)m〜2))的测量仍然是一项技术挑战。一些作者(Hsieh等,1981,Int。J. Rock Mech。Min。Sci。Geomech。Abstr。18,245-252)认为,由于在如此低的温度下稳定水通量需要时间,因此稳态方法是无关紧要的。渗透性介质,并且喜欢一种称为脉冲衰减的瞬态技术。本研究旨在对三个样本执行和比较瞬态和稳态技术。关于稳态方法,使用高精度泵来测量通过样品的水流量。我们显示,通过适当的设置,稳态方法使我们能够在三天的时间内测量到0.8 nD(8x10〜(-22)m〜2)的极低磁导率,并测量到2.6 nD(2.6 X在一天的时间内10〜(-21)m〜2)。虽然脉冲衰减测试仅提供了可比较持续时间内渗透率的平均估计值。脉冲衰减测试中提出了许多问题:确定储层存储因子,微泄漏效应,确定初始脉冲压力,二维机械效应。与普遍认为需要使用瞬态技术来测量极低的渗透率相反,我们证明了使用合适的设备对水渗透率进行的直接稳态测量比通过脉冲衰减的测量更快,更准确。实际上,较低的水和岩石可压缩性会导致压力波快速传播,因此不能说在合理的时间内无法达到稳态条件。但是,当磁导率高于50 nD(5 x 10〜(-20)m〜2)时,脉冲衰减仍然是稳态方法的有趣替代方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号