首页> 外文期刊>Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology: an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing >Is the pacing site closer to the left ventricular septal endocardium in left bundle branch pacing or in left ventricular septal pacing?
【24h】

Is the pacing site closer to the left ventricular septal endocardium in left bundle branch pacing or in left ventricular septal pacing?

机译:在左束支起搏中,起搏部位更靠近左室间隔心内膜,还是在左室间隔起搏中?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Purpose Distinguishing between left bundle branch pacing (LBBP) and left ventricular septal pacing (LVSP) is challenging. This study aimed to compare the echocardiographic distance from the pacing lead tip to the left ventricular (LV) septal endocardium between patients who underwent LBBP and those who underwent LVSP successfully.Methods Fifty-nine consecutive patients (age 71.9 +/- 12.0 years, 35.6 male) with traditional indications for permanent cardiac pacing were included (LBBP group, n = 46; LVSP group, n = 13). Unipolar pacing from the final pacing sites generated narrow QRS complexes with a right bundle branch block pattern in all patients. After the procedure, a physician blinded to the group allocation performed echocardiographic measurements of the distance between the lead tip and the LV septal endocardium.Results The mean paced QRS duration was comparable between the LBBP group and the LVSP group (105.3 +/- 15.6 ms vs. 109.2 +/- 9.6 ms, P = 0.287). In the LBBP group, the interval from the left bundle branch potential to QRS onset was 28.7 +/- 9.0 ms. During diastole, the mean distance between the lead tip and the LV septal endocardium was 0.6 +/- 0.9 mm in the LBBP group and 3.0 +/- 1.6 mm in the LVSP group (P < 0.001). During systole, the distance was 1.5 +/- 1.4 mm in the LBBP group and 4.3 +/- 2.6 mm in the LVSP group (P < 0.001).Conclusions The landing zone of the lead tip was closer to the LV septal endocardium in the patients who underwent LBBP. There is a need for real-time intraprocedural monitoring of the distance between the lead tip and the LV septal endocardium when performing LBBP.
机译:目的 区分左束支起搏 (LBBP) 和左室间隔起搏 (LVSP) 具有挑战性。本研究旨在比较 LBBP 患者和成功 LVSP 患者从起搏导联尖端到左心室 (LV) 间隔心内膜的超声心动图距离。方法 纳入 59 例连续有永久心脏起搏传统指征的患者 (年龄 71.9 +/- 12.0 岁,35.6% 为男性) (LBBP 组,n = 46;LVSP 组,n = 13)。来自最终起搏部位的单极起搏在所有患者中产生了狭窄的 QRS 波群,具有右束支阻滞模式。手术后,不了解组分配的医生对导联尖端和 LV 间隔心内膜之间的距离进行了超声心动图测量。结果 LBBP 组和 LVSP 组的平均起搏 QRS 持续时间相当 (105.3 +/- 15.6 ms vs. 109.2 +/- 9.6 ms,P = 0.287)。在 LBBP 组中,从左束支电位到 QRS 发作的间隔为 28.7 +/- 9.0 毫秒。舒张期,LBBP 组导联尖端与 LV 间隔心内膜之间的平均距离为 0.6 +/- 0.9 mm,LVSP 组为 3.0 +/- 1.6 mm (P < 0.001)。收缩期,LBBP 组距离为 1.5 +/- 1.4 mm,LVSP 组为 4.3 +/- 2.6 mm (P < 0.001)。结论 在接受 LBBP 的患者中,导联尖端的着陆区更接近 LV 间隔心内膜。在进行 LBBP 时,需要实时监测导联尖端和 LV 间隔心内膜之间的距离。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号