首页> 外文期刊>Age and ageing. >Evaluating palliative care case conferences in primary care for patients with advanced non-malignant chronic conditions: a cluster-randomised controlled trial (KOPAL)
【24h】

Evaluating palliative care case conferences in primary care for patients with advanced non-malignant chronic conditions: a cluster-randomised controlled trial (KOPAL)

机译:评估初级保健中晚期非恶性慢性病患者的姑息治疗病例会议:一项整群随机对照试验 (KOPAL)

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Background Patients with congestive heart failure (CHF), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and dementia are underrepresented in specialist palliative home care (SPHC). However, the complexity of their conditions requires collaboration between general practitioners (GPs) and SPHC teams and timely integration into SPHC to effectively meet their needs.Objective To facilitate joint palliative care planning and the timely transfer of patients with advanced chronic non-malignant conditions to SPHC.Methods A two-arm, unblinded, cluster-randomised controlled trial. 49 GP practices in northern Germany were randomised using web-based block randomisation. We included patients with advanced CHF, COPD and/or dementia. The KOPAL intervention consisted of a SPHC nurse-patient consultation followed by an interprofessional telephone case conference between SPHC team and GP. The primary outcome was the number of hospital admissions 48 weeks after baseline. Secondary analyses examined the effects on health-related quality of life and self-rated health status, as measured by the EuroQol 5D scale.Results A total of 172 patients were included in the analyses. 80.4 of GP practices had worked with SHPC before, most of them exclusively for cancer patients. At baseline, patients reported a mean EQ-VAS of 48.4, a mean quality of life index (EQ-5D-5L) of 0.63 and an average of 0.80 hospital admissions in the previous year. The intervention did not significantly reduce hospital admissions (incidence rate ratio = 0.79, 95CI: 0.49, 1.26, P = 0.31) or the number of days spent in hospital (incidence rate ratio = 0.65, 95CI: 0.28, 1.49, P = 0.29). There was also no significant effect on quality of life (triangle = -0.02, 95CI: -0.09, 0.05, P = 0.53) or self-rated health (triangle = -2.48, 95CI: -9.95, 4.99, P = 0.51).Conclusions The study did not show the hypothesised effect on hospitalisations and health-related quality of life. Future research should focus on refining this approach, with particular emphasis on optimising the timing of case conferences and implementing discussed changes to treatment plans, to improve collaboration between GPs and SPHC teams.
机译:背景 充血性心力衰竭 (CHF)、慢性阻塞性肺疾病 (COPD) 和痴呆患者在专科姑息治疗家庭护理 (SPHC) 中的代表性不足。然而,由于全科医生 (GP) 和 SPHC 团队之间的合作,并及时融入 SPHC,以有效满足他们的需求,因此他们的病情非常复杂。目的 促进关节姑息治疗规划,促进晚期慢性非恶性疾病患者及时转入上海卫生保健中心。方法 采用双臂、非盲、整群随机对照试验。德国北部的 49 家全科医生诊所使用基于网络的块随机化进行随机分配。我们纳入了患有晚期CHF、COPD和/或痴呆的患者。KOPAL 干预包括 SPHC 护士-患者咨询,然后是 SPHC 团队和 GP 之间的跨专业电话病例会议。主要结局是基线后48周的住院人数。二次分析检查了通过EuroQol 5D量表测量的对健康相关生活质量和自评健康状况的影响。结果 共纳入172例患者。80.4%的全科医生诊所以前曾与SHPC合作过,其中大多数专门针对癌症患者。在基线时,患者报告的平均 EQ-VAS 为 48.4,平均生活质量指数 (EQ-5D-5L) 为 0.63,上一年平均入院人数为 0.80。干预并未显著减少入院率(发病率比率=0.79,95%CI:[0.49,1.26],P=0.31)或住院天数(发生率比率=0.65,95%CI:[0.28,1.49],P=0.29)。对生活质量(三角形=-0.02,95%CI:[-0.09,0.05],P=0.53)或自评健康状况(三角形=-2.48,95%CI:[-9.95,4.99],P=0.51)也没有显著影响。结论 该研究未显示假设对住院治疗和健康相关生活质量的影响。未来的研究应侧重于完善这种方法,特别强调优化病例会议的时间安排和实施讨论的治疗计划变更,以改善全科医生和 SPHC 团队之间的合作。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号