首页> 外文期刊>Obstetrics and Gynecology: Journal of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists >Complications of exteriorized compared with in situ uterine repair at cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia: a randomized controlled trial.
【24h】

Complications of exteriorized compared with in situ uterine repair at cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia: a randomized controlled trial.

机译:脊髓麻醉下剖宫产时外在子宫修复术与原位子宫修复术比较:一项随机对照试验。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVE: To compare intraoperative complications of exteriorized and in situ uterine repair during elective cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia. METHODS: This study was a randomized, single-blinded trial in 80 women undergoing elective cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia. Patients were randomly assigned to exteriorized or in situ uterine repair. Obstetricians were asked to perform assisted delivery of the placenta. Spinal anesthesia and oxytocin management were standardized. Phenylephrine was used to maintain systolic blood pressure within 10% of the baseline. The primary outcome was intraoperative, postdelivery nausea or vomiting. RESULTS: Postdelivery nausea or vomiting (18% compared with 38%; P=.04) and tachycardia (3% compared with 18%; P=.03) were significantly reduced in the in situ group compared with the exteriorized group. The duration of uterine repair was significantly shorter in the exteriorized group (median 10 minutes [first and third quartiles 9, 13], compared with 11 minutes [9, 15]) (P=.04). The duration of surgery (36 minutes [30, 41] compared with 37 minutes [30, 45]) and estimated blood loss (mean+/-standard deviation 625+/-489 mL compared with 653+/-416 mL) were similar between the in situ and the exteriorized groups. There was no correlation between duration of uterine repair and estimated blood loss. CONCLUSION: Exteriorization of the uterus for repair is associated with an increased incidence of nausea and vomiting and tachycardia during cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia. Uterine repair should be done in situ where possible. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, www.clinicaltrials.gov, NCT00452972 LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: I.
机译:目的:比较脊髓麻醉下择期剖宫产术中子宫外翻和原位子宫修复术中的并发症。方法:本研究是一项随机,单盲试验,对80名在脊髓麻醉下接受选择性剖宫产的妇女进行了研究。患者被随机分配到外部或原位子宫修复术。要求产科医生进行胎盘的辅助分娩。脊麻和催产素管理标准化。苯肾上腺素用于将收缩压维持在基线的10%以内。主要结果是术中,产后恶心或呕吐。结果:与外在组相比,原位组产后恶心或呕吐(18%比38%; P = .04)和心动过速(3%比18%; P = .03)明显减少。外部化组的子宫修复时间明显缩短(中位10分钟[第一和第三四分位数9、13],而11分钟[9、15])(P = .04)。手术时间(36分钟[30,41]与37分钟[30,45]相比)和估计的失血量(平均+/-标准偏差625 +/- 489 mL与653 +/- 416 mL比较)之间现场和外部群体。子宫修复的持续时间与估计的失血量之间没有相关性。结论:子宫外在修复与脊髓麻醉下剖宫产时恶心,呕吐和心动过速的发生率增加有关。子宫修复应尽可能在原位进行。临床试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov,www.clinicaltrials.gov,NCT00452972证据级别:I.

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号