首页> 外文期刊>Obstetrics and Gynecology: Journal of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists >Hospital, Simulation Center, and Teamwork Training for Eclampsia Management: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
【24h】

Hospital, Simulation Center, and Teamwork Training for Eclampsia Management: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

机译:医院,模拟中心和子痫治疗团队合作培训:随机对照试验。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness of training for eclampsia in local hospitals and a regional simulation center, with and without teamwork theory. METHODS: This study is a randomized controlled trial of training in local hospitals and in a simulation center in the United Kingdom. Midwives and obstetricians working at participating hospitals were randomly assigned to 24 teams. Teams were randomly allocated to training in local hospitals or at a simulation center, and to teamwork theory or not. Performance was evaluated before and after training with a standardized eclampsia scenario captured on video. Outcome measures were completion of tasks, time to completion of tasks, administration of magnesium sulfate, and quality of teamwork. RESULTS: Training was associated with an increase in completion of basic tasks; 87% before training and 100% afterward. Basic tasks were completed more quickly; 55 seconds compared with 27 seconds, P=.012. The magnesium sulfate loading dose was administered by 61% of teams before training and by 92% afterward (P=.040). There was a shorter median time to administration (116 seconds less; P=.011). Training at the simulation center was not associated with additional improvement. Teamwork generally improved (median global score rose from 2.5 to 4.0; P<.001) but there was no additional benefit from teamwork training. CONCLUSION: Training resulted in enhanced performance with higher rates of completion for basic tasks, shorter times to administration of magnesium sulfate, and improved teamwork. There was no additional benefit from training in a simulation center, and none from teamwork theory. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN, http://isrctn.org, ISRCTN67906788, reference number 0270030 LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: I.
机译:目的:比较在有和没有团队合作理论的情况下,在当地医院和区域模拟中心进行子痫培训的效果。方法:本研究是在英国当地医院和模拟中心进行的一项随机对照试验。在参与医院工作的助产士和妇产科医生被随机分配到24个小组中。团队被随机分配到当地医院或模拟中心的培训中,以及是否进行团队合作理论的培训。在训练之前和之后,通过视频捕获的标准化子痫情境来评估表现。结果指标包括任务的完成,任务的完成时间,硫酸镁的管理和团队合作的质量。结果:培训与完成基本任务有关;训练前为87%,训练后为100%。基本任务更快地完成; 55秒与27秒相比,P = .012。训练前由61%的团队给予硫酸镁负荷剂量,此后则由92%给予(P = .040)。给药的中位时间较短(少116秒; P = .011)。在模拟中心的培训与其他改进无关。团队合作总体上有所改善(全球平均中位数从2.5上升到4.0; P <.001),但是团队合作培训没有其他好处。结论:培训导致绩效得到提高,基本任务的完成率更高,硫酸镁的施用时间更短,团队合作得到改善。在模拟中心进行培训不会带来额外的好处,而团队合作理论也不会带来任何好处。临床试验注册:ISRCTN,http://isrctn.org,ISRCTN67906788,参考编号0270030证据级别:I。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号