...
首页> 外文期刊>Obstetrics and Gynecology: Journal of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists >The use and failure rates of protective equipment to prevent blood and bodily fluid contamination in the obstetric health care worker.
【24h】

The use and failure rates of protective equipment to prevent blood and bodily fluid contamination in the obstetric health care worker.

机译:在产科医护人员中防止血液和体液污染的防护设备的使用率和故障率。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

OBJECTIVE: To determine the frequency of use and the failure rate of protective equipment by obstetric staff during common obstetric procedures. METHODS: A prospective observational study was conducted of multiple obstetric procedures. The presence, area of specialty, level of training, and gender of each team member were recorded along with the use of protective equipment (cap, mask, eyewear, gown, gloves, and shoe protection). These observations were recorded by two trained observers. Blood and bodily fluid contamination of the protective equipment was quantified and recorded for each person. A forensic medicine reagent (Luminol; Cluefinders Inc., Tampa, FL) was used to detect trace amounts of blood on the inner surface of a selected subset of gowns that had gross external contamination but no obvious penetration. RESULTS: Two hundred forty-one obstetric procedures were observed involving 1022 medical personnel. The use of at least one piece of protective equipment was noted 88% of the time. Compliance with universal precautions by attending and resident physicians in all deliveries (vaginal, forceps, vacuum, cesarean) was observed in 65 (25.2%) medical personnel. The use of protective equipment varied by the type of procedure, area of specialty, and level of training of the team member. In the gowns examined with the forensic medicine reagent, 44% of the cases demonstrated laboratory evidence of penetration. The frequency of gown failure varied with the type of surgical gown used. CONCLUSION: Despite the mandate in the medical community for universal precautions, the rate of compliance remains low. However, even among the compliant medical staff, protective equipment labeled as impenetrable has a high failure rate.
机译:目的:确定在普通的产科手术过程中,产科人员使用防护设备的频率和失败率。方法:对多个产科手术进行了前瞻性观察研究。记录每个团队成员的存在,专业领域,培训水平和性别,以及使用防护用品(帽子,口罩,眼镜,礼服,手套和鞋子的保护)。这些观察是由两名训练有素的观察员记录的。量化并记录每个人的防护设备的血液和体液污染。法医试剂(Luminol; Cluefinders Inc.,坦帕,佛罗里达州)用于检测礼服的选定子集内表面上的痕量血液,这些子集的外衣有严重的外部污染但没有明显的渗透。结果:观察到21例产科手术,涉及1022名医务人员。 88%的时间发现至少使用了一件防护设备。在65名(25.2%)医务人员中,所有分娩(阴道,钳子,真空,剖宫产)的主治医生和住院医生均遵守通用预防措施。防护设备的使用因程序类型,专业领域和团队成员的培训水平而异。在使用法医试剂检查的礼服中,有44%的病例显示出实验室渗透的证据。手术服失败的频率随所用手术服的类型而异。结论:尽管医学界要求普遍采取预防措施,但依从率仍然很低。但是,即使在合规的医务人员中,标记为不可穿透的防护设备的故障率也很高。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号