...
首页> 外文期刊>Obstetrics and Gynecology: Journal of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists >Health care provider attitudes and practices related to intrauterine devices for nulliparous women
【24h】

Health care provider attitudes and practices related to intrauterine devices for nulliparous women

机译:医疗保健提供者与未生育妇女子宫内器械有关的态度和做法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVE: To examine predictors of health care providers perceiving intrauterine devices (IUDs) as unsafe for nulliparous women and of infrequent provision of IUDs to nulliparous women. METHODS: We analyzed questionnaire data obtained during December 2009 to March 2010 from 635 office-based providers (physicians) and 1,323 Title X clinic providers (physicians, physician assistants, certified nurse midwives, nurse practitioners, and nurses). Using multivariable logistic regression, we estimated adjusted odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of the associations between patient, health care provider, and clinic and practice variables and provider misconceptions about the safety of IUDs for nulliparous women and with infrequent IUD provision. RESULTS: Approximately 30% of respondents had misconceptions about the safety of IUDs for nulliparous women. Factors associated with increased odds of misconceptions about the copper IUD and levonorgestrel-releasing IUD included: being an office-based family medicine physician (copper IUD adjusted OR 3.20, 95% CI 1.73-5.89; levonorgestrel-releasing IUD adjusted OR 2.03, 95% CI 1.10-3.76); not being trained in IUD insertion (copper IUD adjusted OR 4.72, 95% CI 2.32-9.61; levonorgestrel-releasing IUD adjusted OR 2.64, 95% CI 1.34-5.22); and nonavailability of IUDs on-site at their practice or clinic (copper IUD adjusted OR 2.18, 95% CI 1.20-3.95; levonorgestrel-releasing IUD adjusted OR 3.45, 95% CI 1.95-6.08). More than 60% of providers infrequently provided IUDs to nulliparous women. Nonavailability of IUDs on-site (copper IUD adjusted OR 1.78, 95% CI 1.01-3.14; levonorgestrel-releasing IUD adjusted OR 2.10, 95% CI 1.22-3.62) and provider misconceptions about safety (copper IUD adjusted OR 6.04, 95% CI 2.00-18.31; levonorgestrel-releasing IUD adjusted OR 6.91, 95% CI 3.01-15.85) were associated with infrequent IUD provision. CONCLUSION: Health care provider misconceptions about the safety of IUDs for nulliparous women are prevalent and are associated with infrequent provision. Improved health care provider education and IUD availability are needed to increase IUD use among nulliparous women. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.
机译:目的:检查卫生保健提供者认为宫内节育器(IUDs)对未产妇不安全以及对不产妇不频繁提供宫内节育器的预测因素。方法:我们分析了2009年12月至2010年3月从635位办公室提供者(医师)和1,323位Title X诊所提供者(医师,医师助理,注册护士助产士,护士从业者和护士)获得的问卷调查数据。使用多变量logistic回归,我们估计了患者,医疗保健提供者与临床和实践变量之间的关联的校正比值比(OR)和95%置信区间(CI),以及提供者对未产妇和偶发妇女宫内节育器安全性的误解宫内节育器的规定。结果:大约30%的受访者对未生育妇女宫内节育器的安全性有误解。与对铜宫内节育器和左炔诺孕酮释放的宫内节育器的误解几率增加相关的因素包括:成为办公室家庭医学医师(铜宫内节育器调整后为3.20,95%CI为1.73-5.89;左炔诺孕酮调整后释放宫内节育器为2.03,95% CI 1.10-3.76);没有接受过宫内节育器的训练(铜宫内节育器调整为4.72,95%CI 2.32-9.61;左炔诺孕酮释放宫内节育器调整为2.64,95%CI 1.34-5.22);以及在诊所或诊所未使用宫内节育器(铜宫内节育器调整为OR 2.18,95%CI 1.20-3.95;左炔诺孕酮释放宫内节育器调整为OR 3.45,95%CI 1.95-6.08)。超过60%的提供者很少向未产妇提供宫内节育器。现场宫内节育器不可用(铜宫内节育器调整为1.78,95%CI 1.01-3.14;左炔诺孕酮释放宫内节育器调整为OR 2.10,95%CI 1.22-3.62)和医疗服务提供者对安全性的误解(铜宫内节育器调整为OR 6.04,95%CI 2.00-18.31;释放左炔诺孕酮的宫内节育器已调整,或6.91,95%CI 3.01-15.85)与宫内节育器供应不足有关。结论:卫生保健提供者对未生育妇女宫内节育器的安全性的误解很普遍,并且与不频繁提供有关。需要提高保健人员的教育水平和提供宫内节育器,以增加未产妇中宫内节育器的使用。证据级别:III。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号