首页> 外文期刊>Occupational medicine >Investing in the health of working age people-good for individuals, business and the economy
【24h】

Investing in the health of working age people-good for individuals, business and the economy

机译:投资劳动年龄的人的健康-对个人,企业和经济都有好处

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Intuition tells us that a fitter, healthier workforce will be more productive, and investments to keep workers in healthy workplaces make economic sense. Accordingly, the focus of health in occupational settings continues to evolve from control of workplace risk and worker protection towards wellness programmes and the modification of health risk factors or conditions that may affect employee performance. What is the case for supporting this evolution of workplace wellness interventions? It is no surprise that the financial, business case for investment in workplace wellness developed in the USA, where employers pay for 76% of the health costs of approximately 150 million Americans, the balance being covered by employees themselves. Here workplace wellness is well defined as an 'organised, employer sponsored programme that is designed to support employees (and sometimes their families) as they adopt and sustain behaviours that reduce health risks, improve quality of life, enhance personal effectiveness and benefit the organisation's bottom line'. In a country where medical spending has almost doubled in a decade to $2.7 trillion, there is a compelling case for action by employees and US employers alike. There is also a real transparency between poorer health outcomes and higher costs; there are tangible 'money in pocket' incentives for individuals and 'bottom-line' returns for employers who engage in health risk reduction and efficient health management strategies. The potential for economic benefit at a national level is also high, since the USA leads the international league table by some margin in the proportion of its GDP (17.6%) that is spent on health care. Current models describing return on investment (ROI) in Europe may appear attractive from a distance. However, with closer inspection and rigorous review, effects seem to disappear; so, are we looking in the right place for an ROI? In the UK, universal access makes health care services largely free at the point of use, with over 80% of services being publically financed, through general taxation and national insurance.
机译:直觉告诉我们,更健康的劳动力队伍将更有生产力,而将工人留在健康工作场所的投资具有经济意义。因此,职业环境中的健康重点不断从控制工作场所风险和保护工人发展为健康计划,并修改了可能影响员工绩效的健康风险因素或状况。支持工作场所健康干预措施发展的情况是什么?毫不奇怪,在美国开发了用于工作场所健康投资的财务,商业案例,用人单位支付了约1.5亿美国人的医疗费用的76%,余额由员工自己承担。在这里,工作场所健康被很好地定义为“有组织的,由雇主赞助的计划,旨在支持员工(有时是他们的家人)采用并维持降低健康风险,改善生活质量,增强个人效率并有益于组织底层的行为线'。在这个十年内医疗支出几乎翻了一番,达到2.7万亿美元的国家,雇员和美国雇主都采取了令人信服的行动。较差的健康结果和较高的费用之间也存在真正的透明度;对个人而言,有切实的“零花钱”激励措施,对从事健康风险降低和有效的健康管理策略的雇主有“底线”回报。由于美国在医疗保健上所占的GDP比例(17.6%)略微领先于国际排行榜,因此在全国范围内获得经济利益的潜力也很高。当前描述欧洲投资回报率(ROI)的模型可能会吸引一些人。但是,经过仔细检查和严格审查,效果似乎消失了。因此,我们是否在寻找合适的投资回报率?在英国,普遍使用使医疗保健服务在使用时基本免费,超过80%的服务是通过一般税收和国民保险由公共资助的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号