首页> 外文期刊>Applied health economics and health policy. >Comment on: 'A Multinational European Study of Patient Preferences for Novel Diagnostics to Manage Antimicrobial Resistance'
【24h】

Comment on: 'A Multinational European Study of Patient Preferences for Novel Diagnostics to Manage Antimicrobial Resistance'

机译:评论:“一项关于患者对管理抗菌素耐药性的新诊断偏好的多国欧洲研究”

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

I read with interest the work of Mott et al., published in Applied Health Economics and Health Policy in 2020 1. In this publication, the authors conclude that "Patients in different European countries do not have the same preferences for the attributes of diagnostic tests to manage antimicrobial resistance (AMR) in primary care."In this respect, and in respect to the comment "Considering patient preferences when designing diagnostic tests is important because individuals' preferences could directly influence their uptake of such tests, yet to date no studies have explored this issue.", I would like to draw the authors' attention to an article published on a related theme from 2013, namely "Perceptions of point-of-care infectious disease testing among European medical personnel, point-of-care test kit manufacturers, and the general public" 2, which was part of a European Union (EU)-funded FP7 project (TEMPOtest-QC—Grant agreement ID 241742) 3. I would also like to draw on my own (albeit non-economics-based) experience in this area 4-7.
机译:我饶有兴趣地阅读了 Mott 等人于 2020 年发表在《应用卫生经济学与卫生政策》上的工作 [1]。在这份出版物中,作者得出结论,“不同欧洲国家的患者对诊断测试的属性没有相同的偏好,以管理初级保健中的抗菌素耐药性(AMR)。在这方面,关于“在设计诊断测试时考虑患者偏好很重要,因为个人的偏好可能直接影响他们对此类测试的接受,但迄今为止还没有研究探讨过这个问题”,我想提请作者注意 2013 年发表的一篇关于相关主题的文章, 即“欧洲医务人员、床旁检测试剂盒制造商和公众对床旁传染病检测的看法”[2],这是欧盟资助的FP7项目(TEMPOtest-QC—Grant agreement ID 241742)的一部分[3]。我还想借鉴我自己在这方面的经验(尽管不是基于经济学的)[4-7]。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号