...
首页> 外文期刊>Rheumatology international. >How much difference does the age at onset make in early arthritis patients? Comparison between the ACR 1987 and the ACR/EULAR 2010 classification criteria for rheumatoid arthritis at the time of diagnosis
【24h】

How much difference does the age at onset make in early arthritis patients? Comparison between the ACR 1987 and the ACR/EULAR 2010 classification criteria for rheumatoid arthritis at the time of diagnosis

机译:早期关节炎患者的发病年龄有多少不同?诊断时类风湿关节炎的ACR 1987和ACR / EULAR 2010分类标准之间的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The age at onset in early arthritis (EA) may influence the disease activity and its evolution. The aim of the current study is to identify possible differences regarding the "old" and the "new" classification criteria between patients with early-onset and late-onset early arthritis. The study included 64 patients. They were divided in two groups, according to the mean age: early-onset EA - less or equal than 45 years old (group A) and late-onset EA - over 45 years old (group B). The "old" criteria as well as the "new" ones were assessed for all patients, at the time of the first visit to the rheumatologist. The initiation of treatment with Methotrexate was used as "gold standard" to calculate the sensitivity and the specificity of both criteria. "New" criteria were fulfilled in 51 % (A) and 72 % of cases (B), while "old" criteria were fulfilled in 37 % of patients (A) and 62 % (B). Methotrexate was initiated in 82 % of patients (B) and in 51 % (A), p = 0.01. "New" criteria demonstrated a sensitivity of 77.7 % (A) and 83.3 % (B), while "old" criteria had a sensitivity of 50 % (A) and 66.6 % (B). Patients with late onset had significantly higher disease activity scores: 76 % (B) versus 40 % (A), p = 0.04. The sensitivity and the specificity of the "new" criteria for RA are comparable in patients with early-onset and late-onset EA, and the sensitivity of these criteria is increased compared to the "old" criteria. Patients with late onset fulfilling the "old" criteria had poor prognostic factors and higher disease activity at the time of diagnosis, which may have possible implications for the disease course.
机译:早期关节炎(EA)的发病年龄可能会影响疾病的活动及其演变。本研究的目的是确定早发性和迟发性早期关节炎患者之间关于“旧”和“新”分类标准的可能差异。该研究包括64名患者。根据平均年龄将他们分为两组:早发性EA-小于或等于45岁(A组)和晚发性EA-超过45岁(B组)。在初诊风湿病专家时,对所有患者均评估了“旧”标准和“新”标准。甲氨蝶呤治疗的开始被用作“黄金标准”,以计算两个标准的敏感性和特异性。 51%(A)和72%的病例(B)符合“新”标准,而37%(A)和62%(B)的患者符合“旧”标准。 82%(B)和51%(A)的患者开始使用甲氨蝶呤,p = 0.01。 “新”标准的灵敏度为77.7%(A)和83.3%(B),而“旧”标准的灵敏度为50%(A)和66.6%(B)。迟发性患者的疾病活动评分明显更高:76%(B)对40%(A),p = 0.04。 RA的“新”标准的敏感性和特异性在早期和晚期EA的患者中具有可比性,并且与“旧”标准相比,这些标准的敏感性有所提高。迟发性满足“旧”标准的患者在诊断时具有较差的预后因素和较高的疾病活动性,这可能对疾病进程有影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号