...
首页> 外文期刊>Rheumatology international. >Rituximab as first choice for patients with refractory rheumatoid arthritis: cost-effectiveness analysis in Iran based on a systematic review and meta-analysis
【24h】

Rituximab as first choice for patients with refractory rheumatoid arthritis: cost-effectiveness analysis in Iran based on a systematic review and meta-analysis

机译:利妥昔单抗是难治性类风湿关节炎患者的首选:基于系统评价和荟萃分析的伊朗成本-效果分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of using rituximab as first line for patients with refractory rheumatoid arthritis in comparison with continuing conventional DMARDs, from a perspective of health service governors. A systematic review was implemented through searching PubMed, Scopus and Cochrane Library. Quality assessment was performed by Jadad scale. After meta-analysis of ACR index results, QALY gain was calculated through mapping ACR index to HAQ and utility index. To measure the direct and indirect medical costs, a set of interviews with patients were applied. Thirty-two patients were selected from three referral rheumatology clinics in Tehran with definite diagnosis of refractory rheumatoid arthritis in the year before and treatment regimen of either rituximab or DMARDs within last year. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was calculated for base case and scenario of generic rituximab. Threefold of GDP per capita was considered as threshold of cost-effectiveness. Four studies were eligible to be considered in this systematic review. Total risk differences of 0.3 for achieving ACR20 criteria, 0.21 for ACR50 and 0.1 for ACR70 were calculated. Also mean of total medical costs of patients for 24 weeks were $3985 in rituximab group and $932 for DMARDs group. Thus, the incremental cost per QALY ratio will be $45,900-$70,223 in base case and $32,386-$49,550 for generic scenario. Rituximab for treatment of patients with refractory rheumatoid arthritis is not considered as cost-effective in Iran in none of the scenarios.
机译:这项研究的目的是从卫生服务管理者的角度评估与持续使用常规DMARD相比,使用利妥昔单抗作为难治性类风湿性关节炎患者的一线治疗的有效性和成本效益。通过搜索PubMed,Scopus和Cochrane图书馆进行了系统的审查。通过Jadad量表进行质量评估。在对ACR指标结果进行荟萃分析之后,通过将ACR指标映射到HAQ和效用指标来计算QALY增益。为了衡量直接和间接的医疗费用,对患者进行了一系列访谈。从德黑兰的三家转诊风湿病诊所中选择了32例患者,这些患者在前一年明确诊断为难治性类风湿关节炎,并在去年内接受了利妥昔单抗或DMARDs的治疗方案。计算了通用利妥昔单抗的基本情况和方案的成本效益比增量。人均国内生产总值的三倍被认为是成本效益的门槛。有四项研究符合纳入本系统评价的条件。计算出达到ACR20标准的总风险差异为0.3,ACR50为0.21,ACR70为0.1。利妥昔单抗组24周患者总医疗费用的平均值为3985美元,DMARDs组为932美元。因此,在基本情况下,每个QALY比率的增量成本将为$ 45,900- $ 70,223,在一般情况下为$ 32,386- $ 49,550。在任何一种情况下,在伊朗都认为使用利妥昔单抗治疗难治性类风湿性关节炎患者并不划算。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号