首页> 外文期刊>Rheumatology >Cost-effectiveness of Spa treatment for fibromyalgia: general health improvement is not for free.
【24h】

Cost-effectiveness of Spa treatment for fibromyalgia: general health improvement is not for free.

机译:温泉疗法治疗纤维肌痛的成本效益:改善健康不是免费的。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

OBJECTIVES: To estimate the cost-effectiveness of an adjuvant treatment course of spa treatment compared with usual care only in patients with fibromyalgia syndrome (FM). METHODS: 134 patients with FM, selected from a rheumatology outpatient department and from members of the Dutch FM patient association were randomly assigned to a 2(1/2) week spa treatment course in Tunisia or to usual care only. Results are expressed as quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) for a 6-month as well as a 12-month time horizon. Utilities were derived form the Short Form 6D (SF-6D) scores and the visual analogue scale (VAS) rating general health. Costs were reported from societal perspective. Mean incremental cost per patient and the incremental cost utility ratio (ICER) were calculated; 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated using double-sided bootstrapping. RESULTS: The data of 128 (55 spa and 73 controls) of the 134 patients (96%) could be used for analysis. Improvement in general health was found in the spa group until 6 months of follow-up by both the SF-6D (AUC 0.32 vs 0.30, P < 0.05) and the VAS (AUC 0.23 vs 0.19, P < 0.01). After 1yr no significant between-group differences were found. Mean incremental cost of spa treatment was 1311 Euro per patient (95% CI 369-2439), equalling the cost of the intervention (thalassotherapy including airfare and lodging), or 885 Euro per patient based on a more realistic cost estimate. CONCLUSIONS: The temporary improvement in quality of life due to an adjuvant treatment course of spa therapy for patients with FM is associated with limited incremental costs per patient.
机译:目的:为了评估仅在纤维肌痛综合征(FM)患者中与常规治疗相比,水疗的辅助治疗过程的成本效益。方法:从风湿病门诊部和荷兰FM患者协会成员中选出的134例FM患者被随机分配到突尼斯2(1/2)周水疗治疗课程或仅接受常规护理。结果表示为6个月和12个月时间范围内的质量调整生命年(QALYs)。实用程序是从6D简短表格(SF-6D)评分和总体健康状况的视觉模拟量表(VAS)得出的。从社会角度报告了成本。计算了每位患者的平均增量成本和增量成本效用比(ICER);使用双面自举估计95%的置信区间(CI)。结果:134例(96%)的128例(55例spa和73例对照)数据可用于分析。直到6个月的随访,SF-6D(AUC 0.32 vs 0.30,P <0.05)和VAS(AUC 0.23 vs 0.19,P <0.01)都使水疗组的整体健康得到改善。 1年后,没有发现组间的显着差异。温泉治疗的平均增量成本为每位患者1311欧元(95%CI 369-2439),等于干预成本(包括机票和住宿的海水疗法),或基于更现实的成本估算,每位患者885欧元。结论:由于水疗的辅助治疗过程对FM患者的生活质量的暂时改善与每位患者增加的费用有限相关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号