...
首页> 外文期刊>Rheumatology >Anti-citrullinated peptide antibody-negative RA is a genetically distinct subset: a definitive study using only bone-erosive ACPA-negative rheumatoid arthritis.
【24h】

Anti-citrullinated peptide antibody-negative RA is a genetically distinct subset: a definitive study using only bone-erosive ACPA-negative rheumatoid arthritis.

机译:抗瓜氨酸肽抗体阴性的RA是遗传上不同的子集:仅使用骨侵蚀性ACPA阴性的类风湿性关节炎的确凿研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

OBJECTIVES: ACPA is a highly specific marker for RA. It was recently reported that ACPA can be used to classify RA into two disease subsets, ACPA-positive and ACPA-negative RA. ACPA-positive RA was found to be associated with the HLA-DR shared epitope (SE), but ACPA negative was not. However, the suspicion remained that this result was caused by the ACPA-negative RA subset containing patients with non-RA diseases. We examined whether this is the case even when possible non-RA ACPA-negative RA patients were excluded by selecting only patients with bone erosion. METHODS: We genotyped HLA-DRB1 alleles for 574 ACPA-positive RA, 185 ACPA-negative RA (including 97 erosive RA) and 1508 healthy donors. We also tested whether HLA-DR SE is associated with RF-negative or ANA-negative RA. RESULTS: ACPA-negative RA with apparent bone erosion was not associated with SE, supporting the idea that ACPA-negative RA is genetically distinct from ACPA-positive RA. We also tested whether these subsets are based on autoantibody-producing activity. In accordance with the ACPA-negative RA subset, the RF-negative RA subset showed a clearly distinct pattern of association with SE from the RF-positive RA. In contrast, ANA-negative as well as ANA-positive RA was similarly associated with SE, suggesting that the subsets distinguished by ACPA are not based simply on differences in autoantibody production. CONCLUSIONS: ACPA-negative erosive RA is genetically distinct from ACPA-positive RA.
机译:目的:ACPA是RA的高度特异性标记。最近有报道称ACPA可用于将RA分为两种疾病亚型,即ACPA阳性和ACPA阴性RA。发现ACPA阳性RA与HLA-DR共享抗原决定簇(SE)相关,但ACPA阴性则不相关。但是,仍然怀疑该结果是由包含非RA疾病患者的ACPA阴性RA亚群引起的。我们检查了是否存在这种情况,即使仅通过选择骨侵蚀患者排除了非RA ACPA阴性的RA患者也是如此。方法:我们对574例ACPA阳性RA,185例ACPA阴性RA(包括97例糜烂性RA)和1508例健康供体的HLA-DRB1等位基因进行了基因分型。我们还测试了HLA-DR SE是否与RF阴性或ANA阴性RA相关。结果:具有明显骨侵蚀的ACPA阴性RA与SE无关,这支持了ACPA阴性RA与ACPA阳性RA遗传上不同的观点。我们还测试了这些子集是否基于自身抗体产生活性。根据ACPA阴性RA子集,RF阴性RA子集显示出与RF阳性RA明显不同的SE关联模式。相比之下,ANA阴性和ANA阳性RA与SE相似,这表明ACPA所区分的子集并非仅基于自身抗体产生的差异。结论:ACPA阴性侵蚀性RA在遗传上不同于ACPA阳性RA。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号