...
首页> 外文期刊>Rheumatology >A multicentre randomized controlled trial of epidural corticosteroid injections for sciatica: the WEST study.
【24h】

A multicentre randomized controlled trial of epidural corticosteroid injections for sciatica: the WEST study.

机译:硬膜外注射皮质类固醇激素治疗坐骨神经痛的多中心随机对照试验:WEST研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effectiveness and predictors of response to lumbar epidural corticosteroid injections (ESI) in patients with sciatica. We performed a 12-month, multicentre, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel-group trial in four secondary pain-care clinics in the Wessex Region. METHODS: Two hundred and twenty-eight patients with a clinical diagnosis of unilateral sciatica of 1-18 months' duration were randomized to either three lumbar ESIs of triamcinolone acetonide or interligamentous saline injections at intervals of 3 weeks. The main outcome measure was the Oswestry low back pain disability questionnaire (ODQ). RESULTS: At 3 weeks, the ESI group demonstrated a transient benefit over the placebo group (patients achieving a 75% improvement in ODQ, 12.5 vs 3.7%; number needed to treat, 11.4). No benefit was demonstrated from 6 to 52 weeks. ESIs did not improve physical function, hasten return to work or reduce the need for surgery. There was no benefit of repeated ESIs over single injection. No clinical predictors of response were found. At the end of the study the majority of patients still had significant pain and disability regardless of intervention. CONCLUSIONS: In this pragmatic study, ESIs offered transient benefit in symptoms at 3 weeks in patients with sciatica, but no sustained benefits in terms of pain, function or need for surgery. Sciatica is a chronic condition requiring a multidisciplinary approach. To fully investigate the value of ESIs, they need to be evaluated as part of a multidisciplinary approach.
机译:目的:确定坐骨神经痛患者对腰硬膜外注射皮质类固醇激素(ESI)的疗效和预测指标。我们在韦塞克斯地区的四家二级疼痛护理诊所中进行了为期12个月,多中心,双盲,随机,安慰剂对照,平行分组的试验。方法:228例临床诊断为单侧坐骨神经痛的患者,病程为1-18个月,每3周一次随机分配3例腰椎间盘突出量丙酮酸曲安奈德或腹膜间注射盐水。主要结果指标是Oswestry下背痛残疾问卷(ODQ)。结果:在3周时,ESI组比安慰剂组显示出短暂的获益(患者的ODQ改善了75%,分别为12.5和3.7%;需要治疗的人数为11.4)。在6至52周内未显示出任何益处。 ESI并没有改善身体机能,没有加快重返工作或减少手术的需要。与单次注射相比,重复进行ESI没有任何好处。没有发现反应的临床预测指标。在研究结束时,无论采取何种干预措施,大多数患者仍然有明显的疼痛和残疾。结论:在这项务实的研究中,ESI在坐骨神经痛患者的3周症状方面提供了短暂的益处,但在疼痛,功能或手术需求方面没有持续的益处。坐骨神经痛是一种需要多学科治疗的慢性疾病。为了全面调查ESI的价值,需要将它们作为多学科方法的一部分进行评估。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号