首页> 外文期刊>Cells tissues organs >Stem Cell Terminology and 'Synthetic' Embryos: A New Debate on Totipotency, Omnipotency, and Pluripotency and How It Relates to Recent Experimental Data
【24h】

Stem Cell Terminology and 'Synthetic' Embryos: A New Debate on Totipotency, Omnipotency, and Pluripotency and How It Relates to Recent Experimental Data

机译:干细胞术语和“合成”胚胎:全能,全能和多能性及其与最新实验数据的关系的新争论

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The rapid progress in the stem cell field, in particular in cell reprogramming, combined with certain recent observations from experimental embryology, has ignited a new discussion on stem cell terminology. The current use of terms describing stem cell potentiality is inconsistent and can be confusing, in particular the widely used term pluripotency and its distiction from totipotency. For cells possessing a complete differentiation potential (but lacking an autonomous embryo-structuring capacity) the term omnipotency (or, as recently proposed, plenipotency) has been coined. The present commentary takes up this discussion and confronts it with recent reports on 'engineering' viable fish embryos or gastrulating human germ disc models using 'pluripotent'/omnipotent cells, as well as on symmetry breaking in aggregates of mouse embryonic stem cells. It is concluded that we should start contemplating not only the terminology but also, even more urgently, the ethical implications of the perspective of constructing embryonic anlagen in humans. (C) 2014 S. Karger AG, Basel
机译:干细胞领域的快速发展,特别是细胞重编程方面的发展,再加上来自实验胚胎学的某些最新发现,引发了关于干细胞术语的新讨论。当前描述干细胞潜能的术语不一致,可能会造成混淆,特别是广泛使用的术语全能性及其与全能性的区分。对于具有完全分化潜能(但缺乏自主的胚胎构建能力)的细胞,已创造了全能(或称全能)一词。本评论着眼于这一讨论,并以最近有关使用“多能” /全能细胞“工程化”可行鱼胚胎或对人类生殖盘模型进行气化以及小鼠胚胎干细胞聚集体对称性破坏的最新报道进行讨论。结论是,我们不仅应该开始考虑术语,而且应该更紧迫地考虑在人类中构建胚胎胶原的观点的伦理意义。 (C)2014 S.Karger AG,巴塞尔

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号