...
首页> 外文期刊>Reviews in the neurosciences >Treatment of trigeminal neuralgia by radiofrequency of the Gasserian ganglion
【24h】

Treatment of trigeminal neuralgia by radiofrequency of the Gasserian ganglion

机译:Gasserian神经节的射频治疗三叉神经痛

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Trigeminal neuralgia (TN) is a neuropathic pain disorder that affects the trigeminal nerve distribution area. Pharmacological therapy has remained the first-line treatment for TN. If pharmacological intervention is not effective, surgical treatments including radiosurgery (mainly gamma knife therapy), radiofrequency (RF) of the Gasserian ganglion, and microvascular decompression have been utilized. RF is one of the most common procedures used to treat TN. Two RF approaches are commonly utilized: conventional radiofrequency (CRF) and pulsed radiofrequency (PRF). Both methods have been used to successfully treat TN; however, each procedure has distinct advantages and disadvantages. This article summarizes the current relevant literature to compare the treatment of TN with CRF vs. PRF. We discuss the treatment indications, operative methods, and complications of each treatment strategy. Most of the patients treated with CRF had a satisfactory outcome, whereas most PRF patients still had significant pain after the procedure. The application of a higher voltage can improve the curative effect of PRF, and its complications are less than CRF. Both CRF and PRF can be used to treat TN, and the former was more effective. Although the complications of CRF are more than those of PRF, most of them were short-lived and lacked sequelae. The pain relief rate in PRF-treated patients was significantly lower compared to CRF-treated patients. Furthermore, recurring pain was more commonly observed in PRF-treated patients. Therefore, CRF may be the preferred treatment option for TN, whereas treatment with PRF requires further study.
机译:三叉神经痛(TN)是一种神经性疼痛疾病,会影响三叉神经分布区域。药物治疗一直是TN的一线治疗。如果药理学干预无效,则可采用包括放射外科手术(主要是伽玛刀疗法),加塞神经节的射频(RF)和微血管减压在内的外科手术治疗。 RF是用于治疗TN的最常见程序之一。通常使用两种RF方法:常规射频(CRF)和脉冲射频(PRF)。两种方法均已成功用于治疗TN。但是,每种方法都有各自的优缺点。本文总结了当前的相关文献,以比较CRF与PRF对TN的治疗。我们讨论每种治疗策略的治疗指征,手术方法和并发症。大多数接受CRF治疗的患者预后都令人满意,而大多数PRF患者术后仍感到明显疼痛。施加更高的电压可以改善PRF的疗效,其并发症要比CRF少。 CRF和PRF均可用于治疗TN,而前者更有效。尽管CRF的并发症多于PRF,但大多数是短暂的,没有后遗症。与CRF治疗的患者相比,PRF治疗的患者的疼痛缓解率明显更低。此外,在PRF治疗的患者中更常见复发性疼痛。因此,CRF可能是TN的首选治疗选择,而PRF的治疗需要进一步研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号