首页> 外文期刊>Resuscitation. >A different rescuer changing strategy between 30:2 cardiopulmonary resuscitation and hands-only cardiopulmonary resuscitation that considers rescuer factors: A randomised cross-over simulation study with a time-dependent analysis
【24h】

A different rescuer changing strategy between 30:2 cardiopulmonary resuscitation and hands-only cardiopulmonary resuscitation that considers rescuer factors: A randomised cross-over simulation study with a time-dependent analysis

机译:在30:2心肺复苏和仅考虑心肺复苏因素的手动心肺复苏之间采取不同的救助者改变策略:随机交叉模拟研究,并进行时间依赖性分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Aim: To compare the time-dependent changes in the quality of chest compressions in 30:2 cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and hands-only cardiopulmonary resuscitation (HO-CPR) and to evaluate how individual rescuer factors affect the quality of chest compressions over time for both CPR techniques. Methods: Total 1028 adult hospital and university workers participated in CPR training programs including sessions of 30:2 CPR and HO-CPR. Tests of both CPR methods were performed in a random order using a manikin with Skill-Reporter?. Data were collected from 863 subjects. The time-dependent changes in chest compressions quality and the effects of individual rescuer factors (age, gender, body mass index (BMI), prior CPR training and experience) were analysed using the general linear model for a repeated-measures procedure. Results: In HO-CPR, the mean proportion of correct compressions depth (MPCD) decreased significantly throughout the time sectors following 20-40. s (74.4-50.4% in 100-120. s) compared to 30:2 CPR (83.4-76.3% in 100-120. s) (p< 0.0001). A significant decline of MPCD (MPCD < 70%) was initially observed at 40-60. s in HO-CPR, however, this pattern was not observed in 30:2 CPR. Individual rescuer factors minimally affected the time-dependent change in MPCD during 30:2 CPR. For HO-CPR, all rescuer factors except for male or obese/overweight (BMI ≥ 25) were associated with a significant declines of MPCD, and these decline were usually observed from 40 to 60. s. Conclusion: Switching rescuers at an interval of 2-min is reasonable for 30:2 CPR. However, for HO-CPR switching rescuers every 1-min may be preferable except when rescuers are male or obese/overweight (BMI ≥ 25).
机译:目的:比较30:2心肺复苏(CPR)和仅手心肺复苏(HO-CPR)时胸外按压质量随时间的变化,并评估各个救助者因素如何随时间影响胸外按压质量这两种CPR技术。方法:共有1028名成人医院和大学工作人员参加了CPR培训计划,包括30:2 CPR和HO-CPR的课程。两种CPR方法的测试均使用人体模型和Skill-Reporter?以随机顺序进行。数据收集自863名受试者。使用通用线性模型对重复测量程序进行了分析,分析了胸部按压质量随时间的变化以及各个援救者因素(年龄,性别,体重指数(BMI),先前的心肺复苏术训练和经验)的影响。结果:在HO-CPR中,20-40之后的整个时间段中,正确压缩深度(MPCD)的平均比例显着下降。 s(100-120。s中为74.4-50.4%),而30:2 CPR(100-120。s中为83.4-76.3%)(p <0.0001)。最初在40-60时观察到MPCD显着下降(MPCD <70%)。 s在HO-CPR中,但是在30:2 CPR中未观察到这种模式。在30:2 CPR期间,单个救助者因素对MPCD随时间的变化影响最小。对于HO-CPR,除男性或肥胖/超重(BMI≥25)外,所有救助因素均与MPCD的显着下降有关,这些下降通常在40至60 s内观察到。结论:对于2:30 CPR,以2分钟为间隔切换救援者是合理的。但是,对于HO-CPR切换施救者,每1分钟可能更可取,除非施救者是男性或肥胖/超重(BMI≥25)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号