...
首页> 外文期刊>Resuscitation. >The identification of risk factors for cardiac arrest and formulation of activation criteria to alert a medical emergency team.
【24h】

The identification of risk factors for cardiac arrest and formulation of activation criteria to alert a medical emergency team.

机译:确定心脏骤停的危险因素并制定激活标准,以向医疗急救队发出警报。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

AIM: (1) To identify risk factors for in-hospital cardiac arrest; (2) to formulate activation criteria to alert a clinical response culminating in attendance by a Medical Emergency Team (MET); (3) to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of the scoring system. METHODS: Quasi-experimental design to determine prevalence of risk factors for cardiac arrest in the hospitalised population. Weighting of risk factors and formulation of activation criteria to alert a graded clinical response. ROC analysis of weighted cumulative scores to determine their sensitivity and specificity. SETTING: An acute 700 bed district general hospital with 32348 adult admissions in 1999 and a catchment population of around 365000. SUBJECTS: 118 consecutive adult patients suffering primary cardiac arrest in-hospital and 132 non-arrest patients, randomly selected according to stratified randomisation by gender and age. RESULTS: Risk factors for cardiac arrest include: abnormal respiratory rate (P=0.013), abnormal breathing indicator (abnormal rate or documented shortness of breath) (P<0.001), abnormal pulse (P<0.001), reduced systolic blood pressure (P<0.001), abnormal temperature (P<0.001), reduced pulse oximetry (P<0.001), chest pain (P<0.001) and nurse or doctor concern (P<0.001). Multivariate analysis of cardiac arrest cases identified three positive associations for cardiac arrest: abnormal breathing indicator (OR 3.49; 95% CI: 1.69-7.21), abnormal pulse (OR 4.07; 95% CI: 2.0-8.31) and abnormal systolic blood pressure (OR 19.92; 95% CI: 9.48-41.84). Risk factors were weighted and tabulated. The aggregate score determines the grade of clinical response. ROC analysis determined that a score of 4 has 89% sensitivity and 77% specificity for cardiac arrest; a score of 8 has 52% sensitivity and 99% specificity. All patients scoring greater than 10 suffered cardiac arrest. CONCLUSION: Risk factors for cardiac arrest have been identified, quantified and formulated into a table of activation criteria to help predict and avert cardiac arrest by alerting a clinical response. A graded clinical response has resulted in a tool that has both sensitivity and specificity for cardiac arrest.
机译:目的:(1)查明院内心脏骤停的危险因素; (2)制定激活标准,以提醒临床反应,最终由急救医疗队(MET)出诊; (3)评估评分系统的敏感性和特异性。方法:拟实验设计确定住院人群中心脏骤停危险因素的普遍性。风险因素的权重和激活标准的制定,以提醒分级的临床反应。加权累积分数的ROC分析,以确定其敏感性和特异性。地点:1999年,一家拥有700张床位的急性地区综合医院,共有32348名成人入院,流域人口约为365,000。受试者:118名连续住院的成人患者,其在医院内遭受原发性心脏骤停,而132名非逮捕患者,根据患者的分层随机分组随机选择性别和年龄。结果:心脏骤停的危险因素包括:呼吸异常(P = 0.013),呼吸异常(呼吸异常或记录的呼吸急促)(P <0.001),脉搏异常(P <0.001),收缩压降低(P <0.001),体温异常(P <0.001),脉搏血氧饱和度降低(P <0.001),胸痛(P <0.001)和护士或医生的关注(P <0.001)。心脏骤停病例的多变量分析确定了心脏骤停的三个正相关性:呼吸异常(OR 3.49; 95%CI:1.69-7.21),脉搏异常(OR 4.07; 95%CI:2.0-8.31)和收缩压异常(或19.92; 95%CI:9.48-41.84)。对风险因素进行加权并制成表格。总体评分决定了临床反应的等级。 ROC分析确定,得分4对心脏骤停有89%的敏感性和77%的特异性;得分8具有52%的敏感性和99%的特异性。所有得分大于10的患者均发生心脏骤停。结论:已经确定,量化了心脏骤停的危险因素,并制定了激活标准表,以通过提醒临床反应来帮助预测和避免心脏骤停。分级的临床反应已导致一种对心脏骤停具有敏感性和特异性的工具。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号