...
首页> 外文期刊>Resuscitation. >Does change in thoracic impedance measured via defibrillator electrode pads accurately detect ventilation breaths in children?
【24h】

Does change in thoracic impedance measured via defibrillator electrode pads accurately detect ventilation breaths in children?

机译:通过除颤器电极板测量的胸阻抗变化是否可以准确检测出儿童的通气呼吸?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

INTRODUCTION: Resuscitation guidelines recommend rescue ventilations consist of tidal volumes 7-10 ml/kg. Changes in thoracic impedance (DeltaTI) measured using defibrillator electrode pads to detect and guide rescue ventilations have not been studied in children. AIM: We hypothesized that DeltaTI measured via standard anterior-apical (AA) position can accurately detect ventilations with volume > 7 ml/kg in children. We also compared standard AA position with alternative anterior-posterior (AP) position. METHODS: IRB-approved, prospective, observational study of sedated, subjects (6 months to 17 years) on conventional mechanical ventilation. Thoracic impedance (TI) was obtained via Philips MRx defibrillator with standard electrode pads for 5 min each in AA and AP positions. Ventilations were simultaneously measured by pneumotachometer (Novametrix CO(2)SMO Plus). RESULTS: Twenty-eight subjects (median 4 years, IQR 1.7-9 years; median 16.3 kg, IQR 10.5-39 kg) were enrolled. Data were available for 21 episodes in AA position and 22 episodes in AP position, with paired AA and AP data available for 18. For ventilations with volume < 7 ml/kg, the defibrillator algorithm detected 80.0% for both AA and AP (p=0.99). For ventilations >/= 7 ml/kg, detection was 95.1% for AA and 95.7% for AP (p=0.38). CONCLUSIONS: Changes in thoracic impedance obtained via defibrillator pads can accurately detect ventilations above 7 ml/kg in stable, mechanically ventilated children, corresponding to rescue ventilations recommended during CPR. Both AA and AP pad positions were less sensitive to detect smaller volumes (< 7 ml/kg) than higher volumes (>/= 7 ml/kg), suggesting that shallow ventilations during CPR might be missed. There were no differences in impedance measurements between standard AA pad position and commonly used alternative AP pad position.
机译:简介:复苏指南建议抢救通气包括7-10 ml / kg的潮气量。尚未在儿童中研究使用除颤器电极板检测和引导急救通气所测量的胸阻抗(DeltaTI)的变化。目的:我们假设通过标准前根(AA)位置测量的DeltaTI可以准确检测出儿童通气量> 7 ml / kg。我们还比较了标准AA位置和替代性前后位置(AP)的位置。方法:IRB批准的镇静对象(6个月至17岁)的常规机械通气前瞻性观察性研究。胸腔阻抗(TI)通过带有标准电极垫的Philips MRx除颤器在AA和AP位置各获得5分钟。通气同时通过气压计(Novametrix CO(2)SMO Plus)进行测量。结果:28名受试者(中位4年,IQR 1.7-9岁;中位16.3公斤,IQR 10.5-39公斤)入组。在AA位置有21次发作的数据,在AP位置有22次发作的数据,而18时有成对的AA和AP数据。对于通气量<7 ml / kg,除颤器算法检测到AA和AP均为80.0%(p = 0.99)。对于> / = 7 ml / kg的通风,AA的检出率为95.1%,AP的检出率为95.7%(p = 0.38)。结论:通过除颤器电极板获得的胸阻抗的变化可以准确地检测出稳定,机械通气儿童的通气量高于7 ml / kg,这与心肺复苏期间建议的抢救通气相对应。 AA和AP垫的位置对检测较小体积(<7 ml / kg)的敏感性较对较大体积(> / = 7 ml / kg)的敏感性低,表明在心肺复苏过程中可能错过了浅层通气。标准AA焊盘位置和常用的替代AP焊盘位置之间的阻抗测量没有差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号